/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: US House report investigating Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook's power has been delayed as Democrats and Republicans are split on the remedies

Good morning!  This Wednesday, let's take a deep breath … Karl Bode / Techdirt : Stop Pretending The Trump GOP Genuinely Cares About Monopoly Power Reuters : U.S. House antitrust findings on Big Tech likely in three reports - sources Charlesarthur / The Overspill : Start Up No.1407: Big Tech gets monopoly slap, Facebook zaps Trump Covid post, Apple tips iPhone date, sex app lock-in, and more Gilad Edelman / Wired : Congress Unveils Its Plan to Curb Big Tech's Power Cristiano Lima / Politico : House Democrats propose antitrust overhaul to rein in big tech Tweets: Donald J. Trump / @realdonaldtrump : REPEAL SECTION 230!!! Will Oremus / @willoremus : Looks like the Trumpers on the House antitrust subcommittee have chosen sides, and they're on the side of protecting Big Tech. If true, that would turn tech regulation into just another partisan issue that Congress is incapable of addressing. https://www.nytimes.com/... Hal Singer / @halsinger : On the whole, Buck's report embraces many of Dems' proposal and is thus a good thing. So this NYT article is a bit too pessimistic. Jordon is crank—who cares what he thinks. https://www.nytimes.com/... Lindsey Barrett / @lam_barrett : republicans decided they liked yelling at tech cos, but they've always been existentially allergic to real restraints on corporate power. “animus” is a fair characterization, but it still means that their lack of interest in pursuing meaningful remedies isn't surprising. https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/... Rep. Pramila Jayapal / @repjayapal : After conducting America's first major congressional antitrust investigation in decades, I can say conclusively that self-regulation by Big Tech comes at the direct expense of our communities, small businesses, consumers, the free press, and innovation. https://twitter.com/... Travon Free / @travon : Then repeal 230. https://twitter.com/... Ted Lieu / @tedlieu : Section 230 in federal law protects your right to free speech on the internet. It's what allows you to criticize @realDonaldTrump or me or the Cleveland @Browns without fear that the post will be taken down. For example: @POTUS is a jerk for suing to rip your healthcare away. https://twitter.com/... Zak Kukoff / @zck : If we destroy the modern basis of anti-trust law — which, make no doubt, is what today's House report wants to do — we'll be setting back America's ability to compete by decades (And it won't be European tech that replaces FAANG) https://twitter.com/... Robert Hackett / @rhhackett : it is astounding this is not already law https://www.reuters.com/... https://twitter.com/... @nytpolitics : Partisan bickering in Congress has cast a cloud over a landmark House report, which caps a 15-month investigation into the practices of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. The report was to feature recommendations from lawmakers to rein in the companies. https://www.nytimes.com/... Mike Godwin / @sfmnemonic : This Times is playing this as if it reflects a recent development, but the incoherence of the spectrum of theories informing the moral panic about Big Tech has been broadly evident for quite some time. https://www.nytimes.com/... Mike Godwin / @sfmnemonic : (It turns out you have to have a coherent theory to reform Big Tech.) Big Tech Was Their Enemy, Until Partisanship Fractured the Battle Plans https://www.nytimes.com/... Mike Masnick / @mmasnick : Things I did not have on my tech policy bingo card this week: The Mountain Goats coming out in favor of #Section230. https://twitter.com/... @nytimestech : House lawmakers were once united against the power of the biggest tech companies. But their bipartisan support has now split along party lines. https://www.nytimes.com/... Matt Stoller / @matthewstoller : 1. I'm reading Republican @RepKenBuck's leaked views on the big tech antitrust hearing, and it's quite a remarkable document. First, the Chicago School has lost the argument. Buck endorses the the fact there's a monopoly crisis. “Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook have used...

New York Times

Discussion

  • @realdonaldtrump Donald J. Trump on x
    REPEAL SECTION 230!!!
  • @willoremus Will Oremus on x
    Looks like the Trumpers on the House antitrust subcommittee have chosen sides, and they're on the side of protecting Big Tech. If true, that would turn tech regulation into just another partisan issue that Congress is incapable of addressing. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @halsinger Hal Singer on x
    On the whole, Buck's report embraces many of Dems' proposal and is thus a good thing. So this NYT article is a bit too pessimistic. Jordon is crank—who cares what he thinks. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @lam_barrett Lindsey Barrett on x
    republicans decided they liked yelling at tech cos, but they've always been existentially allergic to real restraints on corporate power. “animus” is a fair characterization, but it still means that their lack of interest in pursuing meaningful remedies isn't surprising. https://…
  • @repjayapal Rep. Pramila Jayapal on x
    After conducting America's first major congressional antitrust investigation in decades, I can say conclusively that self-regulation by Big Tech comes at the direct expense of our communities, small businesses, consumers, the free press, and innovation. https://twitter.com/...
  • @rhhackett Robert Hackett on x
    it is astounding this is not already law https://www.reuters.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @travon Travon Free on x
    Then repeal 230. https://twitter.com/...
  • @nytpolitics @nytpolitics on x
    Partisan bickering in Congress has cast a cloud over a landmark House report, which caps a 15-month investigation into the practices of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. The report was to feature recommendations from lawmakers to rein in the companies. https://www.nytimes.com/.…
  • @mmasnick Mike Masnick on x
    Things I did not have on my tech policy bingo card this week: The Mountain Goats coming out in favor of #Section230. https://twitter.com/...
  • @tedlieu Ted Lieu on x
    Section 230 in federal law protects your right to free speech on the internet. It's what allows you to criticize @realDonaldTrump or me or the Cleveland @Browns without fear that the post will be taken down. For example: @POTUS is a jerk for suing to rip your healthcare away. htt…
  • @sfmnemonic Mike Godwin on x
    This Times is playing this as if it reflects a recent development, but the incoherence of the spectrum of theories informing the moral panic about Big Tech has been broadly evident for quite some time. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @sfmnemonic Mike Godwin on x
    (It turns out you have to have a coherent theory to reform Big Tech.) Big Tech Was Their Enemy, Until Partisanship Fractured the Battle Plans https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @zck Zak Kukoff on x
    If we destroy the modern basis of anti-trust law — which, make no doubt, is what today's House report wants to do — we'll be setting back America's ability to compete by decades (And it won't be European tech that replaces FAANG) https://twitter.com/...
  • @nytimestech @nytimestech on x
    House lawmakers were once united against the power of the biggest tech companies. But their bipartisan support has now split along party lines. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @matthewstoller Matt Stoller on x
    1. I'm reading Republican @RepKenBuck's leaked views on the big tech antitrust hearing, and it's quite a remarkable document. First, the Chicago School has lost the argument. Buck endorses the the fact there's a monopoly crisis. “Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook have used...
  • @amywebb Amy Webb on x
    I'm not at all surprised by this. There was never going to be bipartisan alignment. Dems and Republicans were never aligned to begin with on the business of tech. There was never a cohesive long-term plan or vision in DC, and there still isn't. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @karlbode Karl Bode on x
    mmm yes what if I told you Trump GOP concerns about monopolization are utterly hollow (see: big telecom) and this entire tantrum is about protecting power by ensuring online political disinformation isn't adequately policed https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @samanthaladuc Samantha LaDuc on x
    Lots of recommendations. Very little follow through. #BigTechBreakUp https://twitter.com/...
  • @reutersbiz @reutersbiz on x
    The House antitrust report on Big Tech firms contains a ‘thinly veiled call to break up’ the companies, Republican Congressman Ken Buck said in a draft response seen by Reuters https://www.reuters.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @adrjeffries Spooky Emojo on x
    I've been sort of waiting for this. The “bipartisan” techlash in the House never really felt bipartisan. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    Weird report IMHO. Way too negative about an investigation that has been largely bipartisan. Facebook and Google would love to drive partisan division through the process but the fact we haven't yet seen a report that press expected yesterday is NBD. https://www.nytimes.com/...