/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Slack discloses a now fixed critical RCE flaw in its desktop app; Slack paid $1,750 bug bounty to researcher, which critics say is a paltry sum for such a bug

Slack and its scores of desktop app users just dodged a major bullet.  —  The communications tool relied upon by journalists …

Mashable Jack Morse

Context & Ripple Effects

This is Slack's second high-profile security episode in recent memory: last year it moved to reset passwords for 1% of users after new information surfaced about its 2015 breach, so a critical RCE in the desktop app lands on a company already carrying that history. The stakes are sized by Slack's own numbers — over 100,000 paid customers and 10M DAUs at last disclosure — meaning a desktop code-execution bug reaches journalists and enterprises that treat the app as core infrastructure.

The bounty amount is the story's second axis. Two months ago Apple paid a researcher $100K for a Sign in with Apple flaw that could hijack any user's account, while an April report argued closed bounty programs with NDAs can buy researcher silence and may even violate labor law. Against that backdrop, $1,750 for a critical RCE reads less like an outlier and more like a data point in a widening gap between what top-tier flaws fetch across programs.

First-order effects

  • Slack's desktop users were exposed to remote code execution until this patch shipped, and the researcher who found it received $1,750 — a sum critics immediately flagged as paltry for the severity class.
  • Slack's disclosure is now public, so unpatched desktop installs become the immediate attack surface while defenders race to update.

Second-order effects

  • Researchers weighing where to report critical findings now have a stark price comparison — Apple's $100K versus Slack's $1,750 — which pushes talent toward higher-paying programs or, per the April critique, toward markets outside official channels entirely.
  • Rival collaboration platforms inherit the scrutiny: their own bounty tables get benchmarked against Slack's payout, forcing security teams to reprice critical-severity rewards to keep researchers reporting in-house.

Third-order effects

  • If the gap between top payouts and typical program tables persists, bug bounty economics stratify — a handful of large buyers set the market rate for critical flaws while smaller programs struggle to attract serious researchers, echoing the labor-law and silence concerns raised about closed programs.
  • As workplace tools like Slack become critical infrastructure with enterprise-scale footprints, vulnerability response shifts from ad-hoc bounty gestures toward standardized, severity-indexed disclosure economics that regulators and customers increasingly expect.

The trend: Bug bounty payouts are diverging sharply by buyer size even as critical flaws in everyday work software carry enterprise-scale risk, pressuring the industry toward standardized severity-based reward structures.

Discussion

  • @dcuthbert Daniel Cuthbert on x
    Slack, used by millions and millions for mission-critical design chats, DevOps, security, mergers, and acquisitions, hell the list is endless. The flaws found by this researcher result in the execution of arbitrary commands on user's computer. The TL;DR is wow https://twitter.com…
  • @samnewman Sam Newman on x
    Great research, shitty reward @SlackHQ - do better. This researcher likely saved your ass, they deserve a comparable payment. https://twitter.com/...
  • @tomayac Thomas Steiner on x
    Folks use @ElectronJS to fill the API gaps that the Web currently doesn't close yet. These warnings you may have heard about this approach are very much about real threats: https://hackerone.com/.... Eliminating this API gap is what Project Fugu 🐡 is about: https://web.dev/... ht…
  • @futureshift @futureshift on x
    Slack and its scores of desktop app users just dodged a major bullet. https://mashable.com/...
  • @loosesecurity @loosesecurity on x
    @Hacker0x01 @SlackHQ @larkinryder Can we do something to rectify this. I know the max you normally pay is $1,500 and you've paid $1,750 but a bug like this could have done millions in damages if in the wrong hands. Hackers are heroes, reward them!!! https://hackerone.com/...
  • @dcuthbert Daniel Cuthbert on x
    Full bug details here https://hackerone.com/... Good work oskars!
  • @qrush Nick Quaranto on x
    Absolutely unreal that Slack only gave $1750 for this extremely detailed RCE report. @iamcal, this is outrageously the wrong amount to award. https://hackerone.com/...
  • @hkashfi Hamid K on x
    Friends don't let friends run Electron apps on their system. Stick to web clients till this framework matures up a bit more & make it harder to shoot yourself in the foot. Or ask an expert in it (not me!) how to sandbox them safely. I run them in isolated VMs. Better ideas? https…
  • @ashk4n Ashkan Soltani on x
    Probably worth paying attention to given how many reporters / MSM newsrooms operate on @SlackHQ #thread https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...