/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at work-from-home trends: rise of “desktop as a service”, purpose-built hardware for remote communication, and more investment in home office equipment

Tens of millions of Americans are working from home and many will never go back; employers scramble to figure out what tools they'll need to stay productive

Wall Street Journal Christopher Mims

Context & Ripple Effects

In July 2020, with tens of millions of Americans working from home and many expected never to return, employers are scrambling to provision them — driving three parallel moves: desktop-as-a-service shifting the enterprise desktop market off owned devices, purpose-built hardware for remote communication, and direct employer spending on home office equipment.

This piece sits at the start of an arc the related coverage confirms ran long. Twitter's two-years-in-the-making work-from-home plan had already triggered a wave of corporate copycats by that October; by early 2022 tech leaders were treating flexibility and geographically dispersed hiring as staples rather than pandemic stopgaps.

First-order effects

  • Employers redirect equipment budgets toward employees' homes — buying home office gear and subscribing to desktop-as-a-service instead of provisioning office desks, which puts new revenue in the hands of DaaS providers and remote-communication hardware makers right now.
  • IT departments built around the managed office endpoint must retool for endpoints they don't physically control, changing what enterprises buy and how they support it.

Second-order effects

  • Device mix inverts: per the related coverage, some workers who started remote on laptops switched to desktops, helping drive global desktop shipments up an estimated 7% YoY in 2021 after a sharp 2020 drop — forcing PC makers to keep desktop lines alive they might have wound down.
  • Competitors are pulled into policy mimicry: once Twitter's permanent-remote stance created copycats, rival employers must offer comparable flexibility or compete for talent at a structural disadvantage.

Third-order effects

  • Home-office tooling hardens from emergency expense into a permanent line item: even as Big Tech compels returns to the office, firms like Atlassian, Airbnb, Dropbox, and Twilio remain steadfast remote backers, so vendors serving distributed teams face a market split between two durable camps rather than a temporary boom.
  • If dispersed hiring holds as tech leaders expect, the employee's residence becomes a standard IT endpoint — a shift that favors delivered-as-a-service computing over owned devices and makes home equipment spending a recurring corporate cost.

The trend: The home office is becoming a permanently provisioned IT endpoint, with enterprise desktop spending shifting from company-owned offices and devices to services and equipment located where employees live.

Discussion

  • @taylorlorenz Taylor Lorenz on x
    The pandemic might have finally killed the open plan https://www.theatlantic.com/ ...
  • @mims Christopher Mims on x
    Brain studies of people in remote video meetings reveal people check out 30-40 minutes in, and this “Zoom fatigue” follows them the rest of the day. We're all in too many meetings; importantly, they're also too long. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @dianeswonk Diane Swonk on x
    Thank you for voicing another poignant way of looking at this. However, a lot of employers are not fine with the loss of women; it represents a huge blow to productivity at a critical time. They were late on uptake and does differ by wage. https://twitter.com/...
  • @idpharmacometrx Marc Scheetz on x
    20 years ago, I read Future Shock by Alvin Toffler and thought... This will happen in my lifetime. Amazing predictions for being written in 1970. Downstream COVID effects. I estimate ~60% of my work can be done remotely as of today. https://twitter.com/...
  • @tommorton Tom Morton on x
    One week into lockdown, it felt like Google Docs and Zoom would make remote working possible. Twenty weeks in, it turns out that empathy and human connection do. https://twitter.com/...
  • @cindyotis_ Cindy Otis on x
    Disabled people have been fighting for years for companies to create remote options, with companies insisting it was impossible. Glad the private sector is finally catching on, but wish it hadn't taken a global pandemic. https://twitter.com/...
  • @prof_smurph Stephen Murphy on x
    The most effective meeting is one focused on 1 or 2 actionable items and 20 minutes long, with a demand that all have prepped ahead. Don't spend 15 minutes reading transcriptions of meeting minutes. Have a consent agenda https://twitter.com/...
  • @mims Christopher Mims on x
    Hybrid work is better videoconferencing in offices, it's transforming office culture into collaborative internal docs, it's better tools for all workers. It's also harder to manage than any other kind of work, and may take decades to perfect. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @wsj @wsj on x
    The Work-From-Home Revolution brings new lessons: For one, the workday has changed, and commuter hours are now fair game for meetings. Here are some more. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @genszen Genevieve on x
    As someone who enjoys study and work from home, zoom meetings are the least enjoyable part. Any more than 4 people and it becomes difficult to properly accomplish through this medium. There's still a place for proper meetings, imo, focused and less frequent. Email for the rest. h…
  • @cbdawson @cbdawson on x
    I continue to question generalizations that treat all video calls as equivalent. Some meetings are well-designed and implemented; others less so. Too many remote meetings are just for passive info dissemination. Good meetings engage everyone to actively participate meaningfully. …
  • @k_morrissey Dyatlov Ass Incident on x
    The number of times I've had to tell clients that there is absolutely no value to spending much more than an hour on a zoom call if there are more than two people on it... now I can just send them a link https://twitter.com/...
  • @profmusgrave Paul Musgrave on x
    This is an important point for professors like me trying to structure content—how long should videos and modules be? https://twitter.com/...
  • @mims Christopher Mims on x
    80+ million Americans working at home in midst of pandemic represent a huge psychological experiment: 62% feel more empathetic toward coworkers but 60% feel less connected to their teams https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @mims Christopher Mims on x
    We're in a transition as big as the concentration of workers into factories, during the industrial revolution. But it's a movement in reverse — back to homes. And it happened in months. We are only just learning how to manage this new way of life. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @mims Christopher Mims on x
    83 million Americans are currently working from home. That's down from an early May peak of 110 million, but it's holding steady. Tens of millions of them have said they never want to go back to the office full time; 82% of their bosses say that's fine. https://www.wsj.com/...