/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Video chat tools like Zoom do well to emulate workspaces but lack flexibility in creative presentation and miss the subtleties of in-person interactions

Software tools simulate work.  They should really let us put on a show.  —  Did you find yourself, over these last fascinating and upsetting weeks, always on camera? Tweets: @jaycuthrell Tweets: Jay Cuthrell / @jaycuthrell : Try using @MiroHQ instead of native video chat add-on whiteboards ( looking you @zoom_us @Webex and @MicrosoftTeams ) and you'll quickly see the entire workspace emulation market is ripe for innovation and tactical feature M&A. https://twitter.com/...

Wired Paul Ford

Context & Ripple Effects

When COVID sent work home in March 2020, Zoom won on plumbing, not presence: its simple client and sub-150-millisecond latency made it the default, as its breakout profile documented at the moment of conquest. But the Wired piece argues that winning the pipe is not the same as winning the medium — native whiteboards in Zoom, Webex, and Microsoft Teams trail dedicated tools like Miro, and the grid-of-faces format flattens the performance dimension of presenting to a room.

That gap has been the opening for a second wave all along: Around launched two days after this piece betting that auto-zoom and noise canceling could make video feel less like surveillance, rethinking the format rather than adding features; Branch, Gather, and Huddle later built spatial virtual HQs where movement replaces the meeting grid; and by January 2021 the incumbents had responded by piling on interactivity features across 2020, per the WSJ retrospective.

First-order effects

  • Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Webex are cast as emulating the physical workspace rather than enabling creative presentation, leaving room for Miro-style specialists to own collaborative surfaces natively inside their own products.

Second-order effects

  • Startups like Around and the virtual-HQ builders (Branch, Gather, Huddle) compete not on latency or reliability — where Zoom already leads — but on presence and flexibility, forcing incumbents into tactical feature catch-up or acquisition, exactly the M&A dynamic Jay Cuthrell flags.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the video-call grid becomes one surface among many: Zoom's planned photorealistic AI avatars in 2025 (an animated stand-in with head and arms) points toward mediated presence replacing the always-on camera — the same subtlety problem this piece identified being solved synthetically.

The trend: Video conferencing is splitting from workspace emulation into a broader presence layer — spatial offices, dedicated canvases, and AI avatars — where whoever owns expressive presence, not the call itself, captures the value.

Discussion

  • @jaycuthrell Jay Cuthrell on x
    Try using @MiroHQ instead of native video chat add-on whiteboards ( looking you @zoom_us @Webex and @MicrosoftTeams ) and you'll quickly see the entire workspace emulation market is ripe for innovation and tactical feature M&A. https://twitter.com/...