Survey: Americans are split on the acceptability of tracing people's movements with phone data, and 60% believe contact tracing tech won't make much difference
@pewresearch https://www.pewresearch.org/ ... https://twitter.com/... @pewresearch : Americans widely support the “right to be forgotten,” allowing people to remove personal information about themselves from public online searches or databases https://www.pewresearch.org/ ... https://twitter.com/...
Context & Ripple Effects
This Pew survey lands a week after reporting that US smartphone owners were split 50-50 on adopting Apple and Google's COVID-19 contact tracing system — so the split on movement tracing is not an outlier but a second read on the same hesitation. It also extends a longer Pew arc: Americans' privacy judgments have always been scenario-dependent rather than absolute, as the center found back in its 2016 study of how sharing attitudes shift with context.
What makes the 60%-skeptical-of-efficacy figure notable is that it attacks contact tracing from a different flank than privacy alone — people aren't just wary of the trade, they doubt the payoff. That echoes the broader resignation Pew documented in late 2019, when roughly six in ten adults said they cannot avoid corporate or government data collection and most saw corporate risks outweighing benefits.
First-order effects
- Public health agencies relying on opt-in phone-based tracing face an adoption ceiling before launch: if 60% of Americans expect little difference, voluntary installs — already split 50-50 among smartphone owners per the Apple-Google coverage — start from a credibility deficit.
- Apple and Google's privacy-first design now has to sell efficacy, not just consent, because the survey shows the binding constraint is belief that the tool works.
Second-order effects
- Governments weighing alternatives may drift toward purchasing detailed location data instead of building consent-based apps — a path the related coverage shows Americans resist even more, with 77% later demanding warrants for such purchases.
- Tech companies marketing health-adjacent data products inherit a trust gap: the same Pew work found far more Americans trust law enforcement than tech firms to handle sensitive sensing technologies responsibly.
Third-order effects
- If efficacy doubts keep proving as decisive as privacy concerns, emergency-driven data programs will need demonstrated benefit to survive politically — pushing the field toward transparency about outcomes rather than reassurance about safeguards.
- The pattern feeds the regulatory current visible in Pew's later finding of bipartisan majorities supporting more government regulation of corporate data use, with tools like the 'right to be forgotten' moving from niche idea toward mainstream expectation.
The trend: The pandemic turned location tracking into a live referendum on whether Americans will trade movement privacy for collective benefit — and repeated surveys show the answer is conditional on both trust and demonstrated payoff.