/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Leaked images from 2019 show Google considered a feature that let users tip money to websites like Wired or NYT as part of its Contributor program

Leaked images obtained by TechCrunch reveal that Google considered and designed a feature that would let people donate money to websites …

TechCrunch Josh Constine

Context & Ripple Effects

The leaked 2019 designs are one more step in a long-running Google effort to move money to publishers outside pure advertising. Back in 2017, [[a:919472|Contributor let publishers charge ad-block users a small fee per page view or to whitelist their sites]], and months later Google was testing subscription-boosting tools with NYT and FT, including changes to "first click free" and payment options.

What the leak adds is a reader-directed variant: voluntary tips to outlets like Wired and the NYT rather than per-view fees. That matters because two months after these images surfaced, Google chose a different mechanism entirely — announcing a licensing program to pay publishers directly for content under the News Initiative — suggesting tipping lost out to top-down payments.

First-order effects

  • For publishers like Wired and the NYT, the designed feature would have added a voluntary revenue line from non-subscribing readers, sitting alongside the existing Contributor per-page fees rather than replacing them.
  • For Google, the feature would have leaned on its existing payment rails — the same Google Pay infrastructure it was already extending with P2P QR-code support in 2018 — making implementation cheap relative to a new product build.

Second-order effects

  • Reader tips would have competed with the subscription funnel Google was co-developing with NYT and FT: every dollar tipped to read one article is a dollar not pushed toward a recurring subscription, forcing publishers to weigh which monetization path they steer casual readers down.
  • A working tipping product would also have given Google a counter to the argument that it extracts news value without compensating publishers — pressure that instead got answered with the direct licensing program announced weeks later.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, news monetization structurally diversifies away from advertising-only economics toward layered models — per-view fees, subscriptions, tips, and platform licensing fees — with platforms like Google deciding which layer gets built into distribution.
  • The choice of licensing over tipping points to a longer-term structure where publishers' bargaining position depends less on individual reader goodwill and more on collective deals negotiated with search and aggregation platforms.

The trend: Google has spent years iterating on mechanisms to route money to publishers — ad-block tolls, subscription tools, considered tipping, and finally direct licensing — as advertising alone proves insufficient to sustain news.

Discussion

  • @joshconstine @joshconstine on x
    Here's a sad scoop: Google designed but scrapped a way to donate tips to news sites. Woulda come in handy... https://techcrunch.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @brianroemmele Brian Roemmele on x
    This would have been a fantastic product by Google. Nano and micro transactions with low friction to creators of useful content will have to take place to support post 2020 Pandemic quality content. Tips to spectacular journalists to artistic photographers—is vitally important. h…
  • @tedgioia Ted Gioia on x
    “Google considered and designed a feature that would let people donate money to websites to help support news publishers, bloggers and musicians. But Google scrapped the idea....” https://techcrunch.com/... Might have had a huge positive impact. And still could.
  • @jonrussell Jon Russell on x
    Tipping as additional (unexpected) revenue for media 👍🏻 Tipping as a business model (critical income) for media 👎🏻 Still, interesting that Google spent time thinking about this: https://techcrunch.com/...
  • @adrianweckler Adrian Weckler on x
    May yet be resurrected https://twitter.com/...
  • @joshconstine @joshconstine on x
    Google's abandoned tipping feature let people pay a few bucks to show sites support. They mocked it up for NYT, Wired, “Tech Crunch”, & more https://techcrunch.com/...
  • @jason_kint @jason_kint on x
    Wow. I can't believe they got away with this answer. Considering publishers around the world actually sent a letter to Google CEO for abusing this process to take user data off publishers' sites. My guess is leadership rejected idea because on 10% cut would hurt their margins. 🤦🏽…