/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Analysis: one-third of donations from employees at big tech firms went to Sens. Warren and Sanders, despite a lack of enthusiasm from tech executives

Financial Times :

Financial Times

Context & Ripple Effects

The Financial Times analysis lands on a split that had been building all cycle: an earlier survey of executive giving found Warren and Sanders notably absent from tech executives' recipient lists, yet Vox's Q4 tally showed Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Twitter workers alone had pushed ~$270K to Sanders — more than to any other candidate. Today's finding scales that up: one-third of all big-tech employee donations went to the two progressive senators.

First-order effects

  • Warren and Sanders gain a funding base drawn disproportionately from the very industry their platforms target for regulation, while rival campaigns funded by tech executives cannot claim the same employee-level support.

Second-order effects

  • The employee-executive divergence pressures Democratic contenders courting both pools: once Warren exits and the field narrows, those same five companies' employees become the largest corporate source of contributions, funneling $15.1M+ to Biden per WSJ filings.

Third-order effects

  • The rank-and-file/executive split prefigures the 2024 realignment captured in FEC data, where executives and VCs shifted decisively rightward — $273.2M to Trump including $242.6M from Musk — while internet-company giving remained majority-Democratic at ~80%.

The trend: Tech's political money is stratifying by seniority, with rank-and-file employees anchoring Democratic primary challengers while executive and VC capital migrates toward Republicans.

Discussion

  • @kateconger Kate Conger on x
    “What is striking about this primary cycle is the schism between the people who run the companies and their workers.” ⁦@NellieBowles⁩ ⁦@eringriffith⁩ https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @cagop @cagop on x
    “For a long time, @millanpatterson said, many local conservatives felt despondent about the state's politics. Now they find themselves surprisingly optimistic.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @teddyschleifer Teddy Schleifer on x
    Mike Bloomberg personally called a high-level executive at Google in order to hire @joshto, who is on personal leave to work for Hawkfish, Bloomberg's digital agency. Another reminder about Bloomberg's relationships to Silicon Valley. https://www.ft.com/... https://twitter.com/..…
  • @bcmerchant Brian Merchant on x
    This story about how CEOs + VCs would rather support Donald Trump (who is caging migrant children) than Bernie Sanders (who would raise tax rates) tells you *almost* everything you need to know about the moral infrastructure of modern Silicon Valley https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @alexsjacquez Alex Jacquez on x
    they've got CEOs. we've got workers. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @opensecretsdc @opensecretsdc on x
    California may be posed to vote for Bernie Sanders, but #BigTech leaders want anyone but https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @nytpolitics @nytpolitics on x
    Many leaders in Silicon Valley hope to avoid having Bernie Sanders as the Democratic presidential nominee, even as their employees are gathering for him en masse https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @dmedin11 Daniel Medina on x
    “The schism [is] between the people who run the companies and their workers. Employees of Alphabet gave $499,309 to Mr. Sanders for the 2020 cycle, his second-largest total donations from one employer after University of California employees.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @arezourezvani Arezou Rezvani on x
    A #NeverSanders movement is taking shape in much the same way the #NeverTrump campaign formed in 2016. Silicon Valley elite urge anyone but Bernie. Elsewhere, the former head of Bank of America says he'll write someone in if Sanders is the nominee. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @davidsess David Sessions on x
    We spend a lot of time on the left reading about how structural ruling-class forces operate. Watching them take human form and mobilize in front of your eyes is still a stunning, spectacular experience. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @owillis Oliver Willis on x
    sanders and warren have all the best political enemies. the robber barons hate 'em. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @went1955 Robert Went on x
    Sanders and Warren scare Big Tech but thrill its workers. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have each received roughly one-third of all donations from workers at Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, Tesla, Netflix, Uber and Apple https://www.ft.com/...
  • @teddyschleifer Teddy Schleifer on x
    The reality is that Silicon Valley is, on the whole, doing extremely little to stop Bernie Sanders. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @toddntucker Todd N. Tucker on x
    “Sanders and Warren have each received roughly one-third of all donations from workers at Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, Tesla, Netflix, Uber and Apple” compared to 26% for Buttigieg, 8 per cent for Joe Biden and 2 per cent for Amy Klobuchar. https://www.ft.com/...