/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: senior management at Apple rebuffed some operations execs' suggestion to relocate part of its manufacturing from China to Vietnam as early as 2015

Production on Apple's devices has been stymied in recent weeks due to delays caused by the coronavirus outbreak in China. Source: Wall Street Journal .

MacRumors Juli Clover

Context & Ripple Effects

This report closes a loop that Apple's own later actions reopened. Back in 2015, senior management turned down operations executives who wanted part of manufacturing moved out of China; five years on, with COVID-19 delaying iPhone production preparation inside Chinese factories, the cost of that concentration is visible in real time.

The subsequent arc is well documented: by mid-2022 Apple was telling suppliers it wanted to boost output outside China, focused on India and Vietnam, citing Beijing's strict anti-COVID policy (per the Wall Street Journal), and by December it had asked Foxconn to begin the first MacBook production in Vietnam. The 2015 rejection matters because it shows the pivot was a known option years before a pandemic forced it.

First-order effects

  • Operations executives' diversification case is effectively vindicated: the same disruption they warned about is now stalling device production, giving their internal argument fresh weight at Apple.

Second-order effects

  • Suppliers such as Foxconn are pulled into building Vietnamese capacity at Apple's request, while Vietnam's own COVID outbreaks and border controls become the next bottleneck for Apple, Google, and Amazon's parallel shifts.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, supply chain design shifts from optimizing for China's unmatched production depth toward deliberate geographic redundancy — accepting higher costs and slower ramps as insurance against single-country concentration.

The trend: Electronics manufacturing is moving from China-concentrated efficiency toward multi-country resilience, with pandemics and policy shocks converting a decade-old internal debate into industry-standard practice.

Discussion

  • @newley Newley Purnell on x
    Apple wanted to make the iPhone 11 in India, where it already makes some devices, but couldn't get it done. Lack of enough skilled labor. Infrastructure not good enough. Turned to China instead. https://www.wsj.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @mdudas Mike Dudas on x
    Funny that the reality doesn't match the ridiculous US manufacturing narrative that Apple and Trump were trying to spin last year https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @jchengwsj Jonathan Cheng on x
    Tim Cook and Apple bet everything on China—then coronavirus hit. Quarantines, tariffs and slumping sales have caused agitation about the company's strategy of assembling most of its products there. @trippmickle @Kubota_Yoko https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @wsj @wsj on x
    Apple bet big on China as a manufacturing hub. After coronavirus, tariffs and slumping iPhone sales, it's facing a reckoning. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @robert_spalding Gen on x
    We need tariffs on Apple products. Tim Cook's huge margins come from the CCP's low labor standards and poor environmental controls. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @rupasubramanya Rupa Subramanya on x
    “When it came time to choose where to make a new model of iPhone analysts expect Apple to launch in the coming weeks, China got the nod."The resilience of China & its manufacturing powerhouse is reconfirmed by Apple's decision despite tariffs +Coronavirus. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @jchengwsj Jonathan Cheng on x
    Last year, Apple tested a plan to make the iPhone 11 in India, but it halted the effort before setting up a single manufacturing line—India wasn't ready to supply skilled labor or the infrastructure Apple needed. It made the iPhone 11 in China instead. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @gerryshih Gerry Shih on x
    “A clean break with China is impossible. Apple relies on a workforce of more than three million indirect workers in China...migrant workers in China...exceed Vietnam's total population of 100 million.” Granular, classic WSJ A1 read on the China dilemma https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @jchengwsj Jonathan Cheng on x
    Apple's reliance on China has long frustrated staff—and more recently investors. The coronavirus represents Apple's third major setback there in as many years, including the U.S.-China trade war and slowing iPhone sales in the country. https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @jchengwsj Jonathan Cheng on x
    “No executive will admit in a public forum: We should have thought about” the vulnerability to China. “But from this point on, there are no excuses.” @trippmickle @Kubota_Yoko https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @carlquintanilla Carl Quintanilla on x
    “A clean break with China is impossible. .. The number of migrant workers in China, who do much of Apple's production, exceed Vietnam's total population of 100 million.” $AAPL https://twitter.com/...
  • @wsmco @wsmco on x
    I'm calling bullshit here. Uses the total number of migrant workers in China, which is irrelevant, as reason production can't be moved? https://twitter.com/...