Sources: Uber and DoorDash held failed merger talks around six months ago at the behest of SoftBank to consolidate the food-delivery industry
Uber and DoorDash held talks to combine last year in a deal that would have accelerated the long-awaited consolidation of the lossmaking food delivery industry …
Financial Times
Context & Ripple Effects
SoftBank's consolidation playbook keeps producing the same scene: a portfolio company pushed to merge with a rival, talks held, deal dead, and the lossmaking status quo intact. The DoorDash talks follow the same script as Uber's earlier meetings with Ola, where Uber suggested a merger to Ola executives without a deal materializing, and the Postmates–DoorDash CEO merger discussions that likewise went nowhere.
What makes the food-delivery version notable is the pattern's durability: four years after the Ola talks failed, Ola and Uber were discussing a merger again — evidence that SoftBank-brokered consolidation attempts don't expire, they recur as losses accumulate.
First-order effects
Uber and DoorDash remain separate lossmaking operators, each continuing to subsidize deliveries against one another rather than pooling the losses under one roof.
SoftBank, the instigator, sees its food-delivery consolidation thesis stalled — leaving it exposed on both sides of a subsidy war it tried to end.
Second-order effects
DoorDash's other suitors stay in play: Postmates had already explored a sale to GrubHub, and a failed Uber deal keeps every combination among the four US players on the table.
Rivals gain breathing room — no combined Uber–DoorDash entity means no dominant player resetting pricing, so promotional spending continues across the sector.
Third-order effects
If the pattern holds, SoftBank-backed markets consolidate not through a single brokered deal but through repeated attempts that eventually land when losses force it — the Ola–Uber revival after four years is the template.
Investor-brokered mergers in subsidized on-demand markets shift the consolidation decision from operators to the common shareholder holding stakes on both sides of the table.
The trend: SoftBank is positioning itself as the recurring matchmaker for lossmaking on-demand markets, with failed merger talks functioning as standing offers that resurface as losses mount.
What's fueling the bruising three-way price war between Latin American ride-hailing and food-delivery companies? Billions of SoftBank dollars. @eliotwb and I explore the circular firing squad Masa Son has set up in Latin America https://www.wsj.com/...
What's fueling the bruising three-way price war between Latin American ride-hailing and food-delivery companies? Billions of SoftBank dollars. https://www.wsj.com/...
Two turkeys don't make an eagle. Food delivery is a fundamentally low margin business since people aren't willing to pay enough to cover fair wage for workers & profits for the company. Even creating monopolies via mergers can't change that truth. https://www.ft.com/...
Latin America was Uber's best market Then came Softbank, which... -led $4 b into didi -didi launched an attack on Uber in latam -price war ensues -softbank puts $1 b into Rappi (food delivery) -price war continues -didi launches food in latam https://www.wsj.com/...
Uber and DoorDash held talks to combine last year in a deal that would have accelerated long-awaited consolidation of the lossmaking food delivery industry, sources tell the FT. SoftBank was keen on a deal. Scoop w/ @MilesKruppa @JFK_America @ArashMassoudi https://www.ft.com/...
Uber and DoorDash held merger talks at the behest of their common owner SoftBank. scoop by @MilesKruppa @JFK_America @EricGPlatt @ArashMassoudi https://www.ft.com/...
Uber and DoorDash - at the request of mutual investor SoftBank - sat down around six months ago, FT sources said. Uber today: “to be clear: our M&A strategy is ours and ours alone” https://twitter.com/...
This story is about venture capital's excesses, but it's also about how something so traditionally Mexican as churros and chocolate can explain competitive decisions made by huge investors. Thanks @jakenaughton for making delicious photos of fried dough. https://www.wsj.com/... h…
“The SoftBank-funded fight is ‘just bad business,’ said Chris Sacca, founder of Lowercase Capital, an early investor in Uber. 'When an investor infuses multiple direct competitors with money to spend in a race to the bottom, it's just a waste.'” https://www.wsj.com/... via @WSJ
Investor giant SoftBank is funding all 3 sides in the battle between food-delivery & ride-hailing services in Latam Uber, Rappi and Didi have the Japanese fund as their biggest owner, creating a sort of circular firing squad. via @RWhelanWSJ @eliotwb https://www.wsj.com/...