/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Study: since the rollout of iOS 13, which warns users of apps tracking their location, marketers have collected 68% less background and 24% less foreground data

Spare a thought, if you will, for the digital advertisers who have grown dependent on knowing your exact whereabouts at any instant.

Fast Company Jared Newman

Context & Ripple Effects

The study quantifies what Apple's location-tracking pop-up with a map of collected data was designed to do: when users see exactly where an app has followed them and why, they stop granting background access. Facebook saw this coming — before iOS 13 shipped it published a defensive blog post on how it uses location data (ahead of the rollout).

The scale matters because precise location was a commodity: apps were sharing coordinates with 75+ companies including advertisers, retailers, and hedge funds up to 14K times a day. The 68% collapse in background collection is the first hard measurement of that supply chain shrinking.

First-order effects

  • Marketers lose the always-on location signal overnight: with 68% less background data collected, audience segments built on where users go — and the ad inventory priced off them — degrade immediately for buyers who never changed their own behavior.
  • Facebook's pre-rollout blog post positioning its location use as user-benefiting becomes the template other data-dependent platforms must copy to defend their permission prompts.

Second-order effects

  • Ad budgets migrate toward platforms with weaker consent friction: the same dynamic later shows up in Apple's IDFA changes, where iOS ad spending fell one-third in a month while Android spending rose 10% (per the WSJ report), leaving advertisers to rebalance spend by platform privacy regime.
  • Location-data brokers and the app developers who sold them signals lose inventory, pushing intermediaries toward inferred or contextual targeting that doesn't require a permission prompt.

Third-order effects

  • If each OS-level disclosure permanently removes a class of silent collection, mobile advertising restructures around whatever data survives the prompt — first-party relationships and contextual signals over third-party tracking, a shift the IDFA opt-in collapse later confirmed when Facebook's advertisers reported broken campaigns (as few users opted in).
  • Apple establishes that interface design — a map, a reason string — is a regulatory-grade lever, letting one company reshape the data economy without legislation and inviting regulators to treat such prompts as the baseline.

The trend: Mobile platforms are converting privacy disclosures into de facto data regulation, with each OS permission change permanently shrinking the third-party location and tracking market that adtech was built on.

Discussion

  • @onejarednewman Jared Newman on x
    The ability in iOS13/Android10 to stop apps from constantly collecting your location data is having the desired effect: https://www.fastcompany.com/ ... https://twitter.com/...
  • @kingthor Soc.Thorin.Klosowski on x
    surprise, when you give people ways to opt out of location ad tracking, they take it https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...
  • @kschwabable Katharine Schwab on x
    Shocker: if you give people a choice on if they want advertisers to collect granular location data, they're increasingly saying no thanks. (by @OneJaredNewman) https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...
  • @harrymccracken Harry McCracken on x
    Amid all the creepy revelations about companies using location to spy on consumers, some good news. (By @OneJaredNewman.) https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...
  • @peard33 Paresh Dave on x
    Apple and Google's tough new location privacy controls are working (to keep small rivals from getting your location all the time) https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...