/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

BitMEX Research report: of 12 big initial exchange offerings in 2019, 11 are almost worthless compared to the price their tokens first traded for on exchanges

Initial exchange offerings (IEOs), which launched in 2019 have lost investors up to 98% of their money, damning new statistics show.

Cointelegraph William Suberg

Context & Ripple Effects

Initial exchange offerings were sold as the fix to the ICO bust, when one-third of 2017-18 ICO tokens never even made it onto an exchange. By having the exchange itself vet and host the sale, IEOs promised curation where ICOs had none.

BitMEX Research's tally shows the curation premium was illusory: 11 of 12 major 2019 IEO tokens sit near worthless against their first exchange prices, with losses up to 98%. That lands the same verdict as earlier blowups like Bitconnect's $2.6B collapse and Bancor's post-ICO slide, and it foreshadows the broader finding that ~80% of freshly minted tokens trade underwater versus bitcoin.

First-order effects

  • Investors who bought these 12 tokens at their first exchange prices have lost up to 98% of their money, with only one of the cohort holding value.
  • The exchanges that hosted these sales — whose vetting was the entire selling point of the IEO format — take a direct hit to the credibility of their token-launch businesses.

Second-order effects

  • Exchanges lose their key differentiator over ICO-era fundraising, forcing them to compete on other grounds just as scrutiny of exchange conduct intensifies ahead of the FTX reckoning later covered by FTX's bankruptcy and $10B of user claims.
  • Retail capital rotates away from new token launches toward bitcoin and established assets, since the benchmark comparison in the 2022 token study shows new issuances underperforming the base asset itself.

Third-order effects

  • If every repackaged fundraising format produces the same washout, regulators gain a documented record that exchange endorsement is not investor protection — pushing token distribution toward registered, disclosure-based structures.
  • The recurring failure rate across ICOs, IEOs, and fresh listings widens the gap between a small set of durable assets and a long tail of near-worthless tokens, consolidating liquidity and influence around major exchanges and bitcoin.

The trend: Crypto fundraising keeps rebranding its launch mechanism — ICO to IEO and beyond — while the underlying outcome stays constant: most newly issued tokens destroy value relative to the assets investors could already hold.

Discussion

  • BitMEX Blog BitMEX Blog on x
    Initial Exchange Offerings (Part 2) - Investment Performance Update
  • @bitmexresearch @bitmexresearch on x
    Initial Exchange Offerings (Part 2) - Investment Performance Update In May 2019 we looked at IEOs. We provide an update on the investment performance of the projects. Compared to the first traded price, in general, investment returns have been poor https://blog.bitmex.com/... htt…