Study of 189 facial recognition algorithms shows they misidentify people of color more often than white people, confirming facial recognition tech's racial bias
Facial-recognition systems misidentified people of color more often than white people, a landmark federal study released Thursday shows …
Washington Post Drew Harwell
Related Coverage
- Many Facial-Recognition Systems Are Biased, Says U.S. Study New York Times
- NIST Study Evaluates Effects of Race, Age, Sex on Face Recognition Software NIST
- A US government study confirms most face recognition systems are racist MIT Technology Review · Karen Hao
- NIST confirms that facial recognition doesn't work equally well for all FedScoop · Tajha Chappellet-Lanier
- Federal study of top facial recognition algorithms finds ‘empirical evidence’ of bias The Verge · Jon Porter
- Facial recognition systems show rampant racial bias, government study finds CNN · Brian Fung
- Many facial recognition tools convey racial bias, study finds CNET · Abrar Al-Heeti
- Federal study finds race and gender affect face-scanning technology Associated Press
- Federal study: Facial recognition systems most benefit middle-aged white males The Next Web · Tristan Greene
- Facial-recognition technology has a racial-bias problem, according to a new landmark federal study Business Insider · Aaron Holmes
- Government study finds racial, gender bias in facial recognition software The Hill · Chris Mills Rodrigo
- Federal study confirms facial recognition is a biased mess Mashable · Jack Morse
- The problem with law enforcement's rapid adoption of facial recognition tech Axios
- NIST confirms that facial recognition is a racist, sexist dumpster-fire Boing Boing · Cory Doctorow
Discussion
-
@drewharwell
Drew Harwell
on x
New: Huge federal review of facial-recognition systems finds that white people get more accurate searches than everyone else. With some algorithms, Asian and African American people were *up to 100 times* more likely to be falsely identified than white men https://wapo.st/2tCGkuN
-
@abbydphillip
Abby D. Phillip
on x
This will surprise no black people https://twitter.com/...
-
@emilygorcenski
Emily G
on x
There are two sides to this: - we should not be developing better, more accurate facial recognition to surveil minorities - facial recognition in China works incredibly accurately compared to American tech, so the racism is just really, really obvious here https://twitter.com/...
-
@macvie
Lori McGlinchey
on x
“The agency did not test systems from Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google because they did not submit their algorithms for the federal study” https://www.nytimes.com/... via @NYTimes
-
@drewharwell
Drew Harwell
on x
@jovialjoy @timnitGebru @rajiinio @ClareAngelyn @JayCStanley .@BennieGThompson: The report “shows facial recognition systems are even more unreliable and racially biased than we feared. ... The Administration must reassess its plans for facial recognition technology in light of t…
-
@nytimesbusiness
@nytimesbusiness
on x
Facial-recognition technology also had more difficulty identifying women than men. And it falsely identified older adults up to 10 times more than middle-aged adults. https://www.nytimes.com/...
-
@aclu
@aclu
on x
One false match can lead to missed flights, long interrogations, tense police encounters, false arrests, or worse. Even government scientists are now confirming this surveillance technology is flawed and biased. https://twitter.com/...
-
@emilyrauhala
Emily Rauhala
on x
As with much of the facial recognition stuff, the problem is not “wow these products are so cutting edge,” it's “wow, these products are remarkably bad.” https://twitter.com/...
-
@schock
Sasha Costanza-Chock
on x
Oh who ever would have thought that face recognition systems have been trained to be technically racist and sexist, which compounds the sexist, racist ways they are deployed? https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
-
@dataeditor
Steven Rich
on x
i think every day about the really stupid tweet i saw a while back about how algorithms cannot be racist because they're math https://twitter.com/...
-
@victorerikray
Victor Ray
on x
It's almost like race is a pervasive structure that is built into the architecture of the social world. https://twitter.com/...
-
@lesarchivistes
Neil Tamzali
on x
So Asian and African American people are better protected than white people from fascist government surveilance? https://twitter.com/...
-
@allie_elisabeth
Allie Gross
on x
Detroit - a majority black city - purchased facial recognition tech in 2017 for over $1M. After using the tech more than 600x DPD, this fall, couldn't tell us how many arrests it's led to. https://www.wxyz.com/... https://twitter.com/...
-
@wsisaac
William Isaac
on x
This NIST pretty much confirms all the pioneering work done by @jovialjoy @timnitGebru and @rajiinio wrt bias in facial rec. At this point, it would be v diffult to see how vendors could make the case for any LE applications. https://twitter.com/...
-
@blmohr
@blmohr
on x
“Asian & African American ppl were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white men, depending on the particular algorithm and type of search. Native Americans had the highest false-positive rate of all ethnicities, according to the study.” https://www.washingtonpos…
-
@shannonvallor
Shannon Vallor
on x
No surprise here but if we care to preserve any justice in our institutions, this is further warrant for a hard chill on govt and security use of these systems. https://twitter.com/...
-
@agidari
Albert Gidari
on x
1) NIST has a new evaluation of Facial Recognition software out. Not surprising, the software keeps getting better and more accurate but demographics matter. https://www.nist.gov/...
-
@profferguson
Andrew G. Ferguson
on x
“The majority of face recognition algorithms exhibit demographic differentials. A differential means that an algorithm's ability to match two images of the same person varies from one demographic group to another.” So, maybe not for policing.... https://www.nist.gov/...