/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Study of 189 facial recognition algorithms shows they misidentify people of color more often than white people, confirming facial recognition tech's racial bias

Facial-recognition systems misidentified people of color more often than white people, a landmark federal study released Thursday shows …

Washington Post Drew Harwell

Discussion

  • @drewharwell Drew Harwell on x
    New: Huge federal review of facial-recognition systems finds that white people get more accurate searches than everyone else. With some algorithms, Asian and African American people were *up to 100 times* more likely to be falsely identified than white men https://wapo.st/2tCGkuN
  • @abbydphillip Abby D. Phillip on x
    This will surprise no black people https://twitter.com/...
  • @emilygorcenski Emily G on x
    There are two sides to this: - we should not be developing better, more accurate facial recognition to surveil minorities - facial recognition in China works incredibly accurately compared to American tech, so the racism is just really, really obvious here https://twitter.com/...
  • @macvie Lori McGlinchey on x
    “The agency did not test systems from Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google because they did not submit their algorithms for the federal study” https://www.nytimes.com/... via @NYTimes
  • @drewharwell Drew Harwell on x
    @jovialjoy @timnitGebru @rajiinio @ClareAngelyn @JayCStanley .@BennieGThompson: The report “shows facial recognition systems are even more unreliable and racially biased than we feared. ... The Administration must reassess its plans for facial recognition technology in light of t…
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    Facial-recognition technology also had more difficulty identifying women than men. And it falsely identified older adults up to 10 times more than middle-aged adults. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @aclu @aclu on x
    One false match can lead to missed flights, long interrogations, tense police encounters, false arrests, or worse. Even government scientists are now confirming this surveillance technology is flawed and biased. https://twitter.com/...
  • @emilyrauhala Emily Rauhala on x
    As with much of the facial recognition stuff, the problem is not “wow these products are so cutting edge,” it's “wow, these products are remarkably bad.” https://twitter.com/...
  • @schock Sasha Costanza-Chock on x
    Oh who ever would have thought that face recognition systems have been trained to be technically racist and sexist, which compounds the sexist, racist ways they are deployed? https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • @dataeditor Steven Rich on x
    i think every day about the really stupid tweet i saw a while back about how algorithms cannot be racist because they're math https://twitter.com/...
  • @victorerikray Victor Ray on x
    It's almost like race is a pervasive structure that is built into the architecture of the social world. https://twitter.com/...
  • @lesarchivistes Neil Tamzali on x
    So Asian and African American people are better protected than white people from fascist government surveilance? https://twitter.com/...
  • @allie_elisabeth Allie Gross on x
    Detroit - a majority black city - purchased facial recognition tech in 2017 for over $1M. After using the tech more than 600x DPD, this fall, couldn't tell us how many arrests it's led to. https://www.wxyz.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @wsisaac William Isaac on x
    This NIST pretty much confirms all the pioneering work done by @jovialjoy @timnitGebru and @rajiinio wrt bias in facial rec. At this point, it would be v diffult to see how vendors could make the case for any LE applications. https://twitter.com/...
  • @blmohr @blmohr on x
    “Asian & African American ppl were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white men, depending on the particular algorithm and type of search. Native Americans had the highest false-positive rate of all ethnicities, according to the study.” https://www.washingtonpos…
  • @shannonvallor Shannon Vallor on x
    No surprise here but if we care to preserve any justice in our institutions, this is further warrant for a hard chill on govt and security use of these systems. https://twitter.com/...
  • @agidari Albert Gidari on x
    1) NIST has a new evaluation of Facial Recognition software out. Not surprising, the software keeps getting better and more accurate but demographics matter. https://www.nist.gov/...
  • @profferguson Andrew G. Ferguson on x
    “The majority of face recognition algorithms exhibit demographic differentials. A differential means that an algorithm's ability to match two images of the same person varies from one demographic group to another.” So, maybe not for policing.... https://www.nist.gov/...