/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

YouTube bans videos that “maliciously insult” people based on their race, gender, or sex, and will remove some of Steven Crowder's videos targeting Carlos Maza

stuff that targets entire groups. Ben Shapiro smearing Muslims as terrorists. Lauren Southern railing against “mass migration.” This is hate speech with a smile. Carlos Maza / @gaywonk : 2. YouTube makes exceptions for popular creators like Crowder, even when moderators flag clear rule-breaking. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ... Carlos Maza / @gaywonk : 4. Demonetization doesn't work on YouTube. It never has. People like Crowder make money through merch sales and direct donations, not AdSense. As long as YouTube gives them a free platform to find new customers, they'll keep breaking the rules. Demonetization doesn't work. Charles Arthur / @charlesarthur : Looking forward to lots of YouTube chinstroking on what crosses the line of “maliciously insult” and what is just “insult”. https://twitter.com/... Susan Wojcicki / @susanwojcicki : .@YouTube, we take it very seriously when creators share stories about harassment. Today we announced an update to our harassment policy that will help make YouTube a better place for everyone. Read more here: https://youtube.googleblog.com/ ... Hern / @alexhern : YouTube has rewritten its harassment policy to finally address the Stephen Crowder Problem: what happens when you spend years never quite crossing the line, and make someone's life hell in the process? https://youtube.googleblog.com/ ... Martin Sfp Bryant / @martinsfp : Well they took their time on this one, but... https://twitter.com/... David Mack / @davidmackau : massive (and shockingly belated) win here for my talented friend @gaywonk https://www.buzzfeed.com/... Carlos Maza / @gaywonk : YouTube claims it will now ban content that maliciously insults people based on race, sex, etc. https://www.buzzfeed.com/... Matt Navarra / @mattnavarra : YouTube's changes to its anti-harassment policy ban video creators from insulting one another on basis of race, gender expression, or sexual orientation — even if person they are insulting is a popular creator, celeb, politician, or other public figure https://www.theverge.com/... See also Mediagazer

BuzzFeed Mark Di Stefano

Discussion

  • Vox Shirin Ghaffary on x
    6 months after a major public controversy, YouTube is changing its anti-harassment policies
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    My reaction to YouTube's policy announcement is extreme skepticism: 1. “Malicious insults” were already prohibited under YouTube's anti-hate and anti-harassment policies. YouTube rolls out policies like this to distract reporters from the real story: YouTube's non-enforcement.
  • @ytcreators @ytcreators on x
    Many of you have told us we need to do a better job preventing harassment on YouTube, so we consulted with a wide array of creators, experts and organizations to update our harassment policy, which changed today https://youtube.googleblog.com/ .... ⬇️Here's what it covers:
  • @markdistef Mark Di Stefano on x
    YouTube has also specifically looked at whether Donald Trump repeatedly insulting Elizabeth Warren by calling her “Pocahontas” would violate the new policies. The answer? No...... https://www.buzzfeed.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    TL;DR: YouTube loves to manage PR crises by rolling out vague content policies they don't actually enforce. These policies only work if YouTube is willing to take down its most popular rule-breakers. And there's no reason, so far, to believe that it is.
  • @youtube @youtube on x
    We believe in people having the freedom to express opinions, including negative or controversial ones, but many creators have told us that we need to do a better job to prevent harassment on You Tube, so we took a close look at our current community guidelines... https://twitter.…
  • @youtube @youtube on x
    ...and with input from experts and creators, we made changes to our harassment policy to better protect both creators and users from abuse, while still allowing for freedom of expression to promote vigorous debate. More details here https://youtube.googleblog.com/ ...
  • @prageru @prageru on x
    You have been harassing us for years by restricting hundreds of our videos. https://twitter.com/...
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    3. “Malicious insults” are only a small part of the problem on YouTube. The bigger problem is hateful content — stuff that targets entire groups. Ben Shapiro smearing Muslims as terrorists. Lauren Southern railing against “mass migration.” This is hate speech with a smile.
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    2. YouTube makes exceptions for popular creators like Crowder, even when moderators flag clear rule-breaking. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    4. Demonetization doesn't work on YouTube. It never has. People like Crowder make money through merch sales and direct donations, not AdSense. As long as YouTube gives them a free platform to find new customers, they'll keep breaking the rules. Demonetization doesn't work.
  • @charlesarthur Charles Arthur on x
    Looking forward to lots of YouTube chinstroking on what crosses the line of “maliciously insult” and what is just “insult”. https://twitter.com/...
  • @susanwojcicki Susan Wojcicki on x
    .@YouTube, we take it very seriously when creators share stories about harassment. Today we announced an update to our harassment policy that will help make YouTube a better place for everyone. Read more here: https://youtube.googleblog.com/ ...
  • @alexhern Hern on x
    YouTube has rewritten its harassment policy to finally address the Stephen Crowder Problem: what happens when you spend years never quite crossing the line, and make someone's life hell in the process? https://youtube.googleblog.com/ ...
  • @martinsfp Martin Sfp Bryant on x
    Well they took their time on this one, but... https://twitter.com/...
  • @davidmackau David Mack on x
    massive (and shockingly belated) win here for my talented friend @gaywonk https://www.buzzfeed.com/...
  • @gaywonk Carlos Maza on x
    YouTube claims it will now ban content that maliciously insults people based on race, sex, etc. https://www.buzzfeed.com/...
  • @mattnavarra Matt Navarra on x
    YouTube's changes to its anti-harassment policy ban video creators from insulting one another on basis of race, gender expression, or sexual orientation — even if person they are insulting is a popular creator, celeb, politician, or other public figure https://www.theverge.com/..…