/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Analysis: Series A and Series B rounds have annually accounted for between 21% and 37% of total $100M+ VC rounds across the globe since 2010

It's become the norm for some private tech companies to raise in a single round what VC firms raise for an entire new fund.

Crunchbase News Jason D. Rowley

Context & Ripple Effects

This analysis quantifies how far stage boundaries have blurred: since 2010, between 21% and 37% of global $100M+ VC rounds each year were Series A or B deals — rounds nominally for early-stage companies that now rival the size of an entire new VC fund. It sits alongside research counting 455 giant $100M+ rounds in 2019 alone, worth ~$108B or 47% of dollar volume, which shows how much of the market's money moves through these outsized checks.

The pattern connects two other data points in the coverage: US median Series A deal size reached $8.6M between 2018 and early 2020, and analysts had already framed the largest growth rounds as effectively private IPOs absorbing most of the industry's increased funding. Early-stage rounds joining the $100M+ club is the same phenomenon working its way down the stack.

First-order effects

  • Founders raising Series A or B can now take in fund-scale capital in one step, letting them skip or compress the intermediate rounds the traditional venture ladder assumed.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, stage labels lose their meaning as sizing signals: capital concentrates into fewer, larger checks earlier in company life, and the late-stage dynamics once reserved for pre-IPO companies — including the rise of over 1,000 insider-only 'inside rounds' in 2020 — migrate down into Series A and B.

The trend: Venture financing is inflating round sizes at every stage simultaneously, eroding the traditional distinction between early-stage and growth-stage capital.