/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Google says it will update the Pixel 4 “in the coming months” with an option that requires open eyes for the phone's face unlock to be successful

In the meanwhile, learn how to use the lockdown feature  —  One of the headline features for the Google Pixel 4 is that it adds a new …

The Verge Dieter Bohn

Context & Ripple Effects

This promise lands three days after the BBC's report that Google confirmed the Pixel 4's Face Unlock can grant access even when a user's eyes are closed — an admission that turned a headline launch feature into a security liability within days of shipping.

The fix is also a software patch over how the feature was built: Google had earlier disclosed paying people $5 to scan their faces to improve accuracy, and the open-eyes toggle effectively asks users to trade some of that accuracy back for safety until the update arrives.

First-order effects

  • Pixel 4 owners are told to use the phone's lockdown feature as the interim safeguard while they wait months for the open-eyes setting to ship.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • Biometric defaults become a post-launch reputational battleground for phones: features rushed to launch specs now get re-litigated publicly, pushing vendors toward conservative security defaults and heavier pre-launch scrutiny of training data like the paid face-scan collection.

The trend: Phone makers are moving from convenience-first biometric launches to security-first defaults, with public disclosures forcing mid-cycle reversals rather than design-time fixes.

Discussion

  • @glytchtech Glytch on x
    in other words, ignore the problem until the news cycle forgets about it and then carry on as is https://twitter.com/...
  • @raywongy Raymond Wong on x
    Good. But how did engineers fuck this up in the first place? https://twitter.com/...
  • @_am1t Amit Gawande on x
    All it took was to look around and check what the competition provided. They should have done this before launching the device - not get caught by surprise. This is not some edge case. It was must-have right from day one. https://twitter.com/...
  • @1obefiend Effi Saharudin on x
    This is PIXEL. Apple would probably patch this in 3 days. Really shambolic https://twitter.com/...
  • @andrewmartonik Andrew Martonik on x
    The Pixel 4 XL is easily Google's best-ever phone. I love using it, and it isn't riddled with basic failures and shortcomings. But my word, the battery life is horrible. And it's hard not to feel overcharged paying $900 for 6GB RAM / 64GB storage. https://www.androidcentral.com/ …
  • @summerson Cammibal Lecter on x
    I would argue that “the most important things about it can't be found on a spec sheet” is so true for most modern tech. That's why actually using things is so important. The experience is everything. https://twitter.com/...
  • @journeydan Daniel Bader on x
    The Pixel 4 is a fantastic phone completely undermined by its terrible battery life. It's also the first Pixel I can't recommend https://www.androidcentral.com/ ...
  • @reckless Nilay Patel on x
    You can't even use the Pixel 4 unless you agree to five mandatory agreements, including binding arbitration with a buried opt-out. https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @journeydan Daniel Bader on x
    Motion Sense is a gimmick right now, but the tech is sound. Face unlock is fast — faster than Face ID even, though less secure — and apps that work with it are 100x more convenient. But only five apps support face unlock right now 😅
  • @journeydan Daniel Bader on x
    So if you're looking to buy a Pixel this year, get the larger Pixel 4 XL because at least it'll last the day https://www.androidcentral.com/ ...
  • @reckless Nilay Patel on x
    Here's @backlon's Pixel 4 review! It is a near-perfect Android experience, marred by a less-secure face unlock, a too-small battery in the small one, and that missing ultrawide lens https://www.theverge.com/...
  • @androidcentral @androidcentral on x
    The smaller Pixel 4 is a fantastic phone that's completely undermined by its terrible battery life 🔋 This is the first Pixel we just can't recommend 😓 https://www.androidcentral.com/ ...
  • @androidcentral @androidcentral on x
    Google Pixel 4 XL review: 📱 excellent hardware and 90Hz display 📷 the best camera you can get today 💡 fast, consistent and helpful software 🔋 terrible battery life, once again 🔒 great face unlock with almost no app support https://www.androidcentral.com/ ...
  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    Here's my review of the Google Pixel 4 and 4 XL. My takeaway is that the most important things about it can't be found on a spec sheet. https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/...