/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Verizon and T-Mobile say Pixel 4 won't support RCS messaging on their networks at launch

The rollout of RCS messaging has been an absolute mess - to the point where Google is actually taking things over from carriers.  Now, there's more bad news.  Google's Pixel 4 won't support RCS …

9to5Google Ben Schoon

Context & Ripple Effects

RCS has been stuck in carrier-by-carrier fragments since Google first switched it on for Sprint devices in 2016 — a rollout whose RCS never interworked with AT&T, T-Mobile, or other carriers' implementations. Verizon then enabled RCS for the Pixel 3 on its own network in late 2018 (the same carrier-flagship pairing now failing for the Pixel 4), and Google extended support to its Fi network and a short device list in January.

The Pixel 4 news lands a week before the four national carriers announce the Cross Carrier Messaging Initiative to unify RCS across their networks in 2020 — an implicit admission that per-carrier enablement, the model that just left Google's new flagship without RCS on two of them, wasn't working.

First-order effects

  • Pixel 4 buyers on Verizon and T-Mobile lose upgraded messaging features like read receipts and richer media at launch, even though Verizon had already shipped RCS for the Pixel 3 a year earlier.

Second-order effects

  • Carrier fragmentation pushes Google to take RCS deployment into its own hands rather than wait on operator integrations, while Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint counter with the Cross Carrier Messaging Initiative to standardize rollout across all four networks in 2020.

Third-order effects

  • If carrier-led enablement keeps stranding flagships, control of Android's default messaging layer migrates from operators to Google and industry consortia, reducing carriers to pipes in the conversation stack they once owned.

The trend: Carrier-controlled RCS is giving way to platform-led and consortium-managed messaging, as each failed per-operator rollout shifts leverage toward Google and cross-carrier standards bodies.

Discussion

  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    Google betting its entire messaging strategy for Android on (checks notes) cell phone carriers doing the right thing for consumers was not a very good strategy. https://twitter.com/...
  • @thisisfoxx Chris Fox on x
    Proof, for those asking #madebygoogle #pixel4 pic.twitter.com/mBDJphVpfB
  • @stevecheney Steve Cheney on x
    Crisp example of how far Apple is ahead on system level integration - chips / software. Expect a much wider lead on the next platform. Pixel 4: “Your phone can also be unlocked by someone else if it's held up to your face, even if your eyes are closed.” https://www.bbc.com/...
  • @raywongy Raymond Wong on x
    WYD Google? WYD Samsung? Apple: Lulz https://twitter.com/...
  • @_am1t Amit Gawande on x
    “Pixel 4 Face Unlock meets the security requirements as a strong biometric.” — how is unlock when someone has eyes closed a “strong” biometric. This is complete bs. This is especially troublesome because Pixel 4 lacks fingerprint scanning. A big let down from Google. https://twit…
  • @piratesyar @piratesyar on x
    I love new tech, I'm excited about so much tech on the Pixel 4. but face unlock freaks me out. https://twitter.com/...
  • @edbott Ed Bott on x
    Not good. Not good at all. https://twitter.com/...