/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

In one of the first cases of its kind, a British High Court has ruled that police use of live facial recognition does not violate privacy or human rights

Adam Satariano / New York Times :

New York Times Adam Satariano

Discussion

  • @hannah_couchman Hannah Couchman on x
    BREAKING: While the Court said live #facialrecognition does not unlawfully breach our rights, they agreed w/ us that the data collected is “intrinsically private”, more like a fingerprint or DNA than a photo + that the tech interferes w/ the privacy rights of everyone scanned. ht…
  • @mattburgess1 Matt Burgess on x
    New: The High Court has ruled South Wales Police use of facial recognition technology is legal. Judges say its current form doesn't breach the Human Rights Act and UK data protection rules are sufficient to govern its use https://www.wired.co.uk/...