Sources: Facebook paid hundreds of contractors to transcribe user audio; FB says it's stopped the work, which affected users who wanted voice chats transcribed
- Social network says it paused human review of conversations — Apple, Amazon, Google have been scrutinized for similar work
BloombergSarah Frier
Context & Ripple Effects
Facebook's admission that hundreds of contractors transcribed Messenger voice chats closes a month in which the same practice surfaced across the industry: Amazon had just added an opt-out for Alexa's human review, following similar moves by Apple and Google. The pause leaves users who wanted voice chats transcribed without the feature — and puts Facebook under the same scrutiny its rivals were already absorbing.
The fallout was quick to compound: within two weeks Hamburg's data protection authority opened a probe into Facebook's transcription work, adding to its investigation of Google's speech assistant, and Facebook later confirmed Portal clips were also transcribed by contractors. The December cross-industry investigation into how Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook handle voice transcriptions framed this as one systemic practice, not one company's slip.
First-order effects
Users who wanted Messenger voice chats transcribed lose the feature outright, since the human review pipeline behind it is paused.
Hundreds of transcription contractors lose the Facebook work, and Facebook joins Apple, Amazon, and Google in publicly curtailing undisclosed human review of user audio.
Second-order effects
Regulators move from scrutiny to action: the German data protection authority's probe of Facebook extends the pattern already applied to Google's speech assistant, raising compliance pressure on every player in the group.
If the pattern holds, the industry's default sourcing model for speech-training data shifts from silent contractor access to opt-in, sometimes compensated collection — with opt-out controls becoming table stakes and EU regulators setting the enforcement pace.
The episode foreshadows the consolidation described in the December investigation: four rivals converging on identical practices means transcription governance becomes a shared regulatory target rather than a single-company scandal.
The trend: Voice-assistant data collection is moving from undisclosed contractor transcription toward explicit consent and compensation, driven by regulatory probes across Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Google.
Facebook confirms it has done this, but says it's not happening anymore: “Much like Apple and Google, we paused human review of audio more than a week ago.”
So not to ignore the privacy implications which are huge but at this point does any major tech company in voice/speech recognition NOT do this and what does that say about the state of the technology? Has anyone actually developed working tech that doesn't require lots of humans?…
So @Facebook had contractors listening & transcribing ppl's audio chats. Not great. But what's also not great is this response about why FB did it. Saying that ppl consented to such recordings is a pretty weak reason, imho. https://www.bloomberg.com/... HT: @sarahfrier https://tw…
After Apple, Amazon, Microsoft & Google, Facebook now admits people listened to your audio recordings https://www.bloomberg.com/... No, it's not a conspiracy. Tech companies crafted a convenient narrative that omitted the need for humans in the AI loop, and now people are findin…
Facebook is doing the same thing other tech companies are doing: sending audio to human beings to double-check their AI is transcribing properly. All the companies claim to have stopped. Deleting Facebook is a performative boycott, unless you also delete Instagram and What's App.…
Oh my... of course they were. And the secret program was called “Prism” which I'm certain @Snowden will find to be a delightful choice. https://twitter.com/...
feels like trending topics 2.0 (minus the obviously long lasting political fallout) people are uncomfortable with humans doing labor yet machines are not good enough to do the work so get trained by humans https://twitter.com/...
If we want voice AI assistants to get better - tech cos will have to keep doing this, probably for years to come, until there is some tech breakthrough that makes review unnecessary. As soon as GAFAM add proper warnings and opt-in or opt-out options, this becomes a non-issue
This won't help the “Facebook is listening to me!” rumors. I never believed them, other than the usual stuff. Anyway, sad that we have to rely on whistleblowers for this to come through. https://twitter.com/...
Last week, Facebook told me point blank that human workers only read or listened to Messenger content in order to enforce Facebook's policies, and never to train its AI systems. Apparently that meant “We did do it until literally days ago.” https://www.bloomberg.com/...
6/ Here's what the data policies state: “Our systems automatically process content and communications you and others provide to analyze context and what's in them for the purposes described below.”
5/ Facebook has denied - repeatedly - that it listens to users through their microphone when they are not using the microphone. This would fall under the “using the microphone” situation apparently. Still feels weird that they'd stop doing this if it really wasn't an issue.
Also, straight up thank you to the contractors doing this work for Facebook, Amazon, Apple and others, who felt it was wrong and told someone about it. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, etc. https://twitter.com/...