/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at the 14 US states that used paperless voting machines in 2018, which experts say can easily be hacked, and the slow and uneven efforts to replace them

Paperless voting devices are a gaping weakness in the patchwork U.S. election system, security experts say.

Politico

Context & Ripple Effects

This story closes a loop that opened well before the 2018 midterms: a 50-state election security survey found only 13 of 40 responding states planned to buy new voting machines, and by September 2018 the infrastructure was still largely unchanged two years after hackers penetrated voter-registration networks (registration network breaches). The Politico piece maps where that inertia landed — fourteen states still voting on paperless devices experts consider trivially hackable.

What makes the slow replacement politically charged is that a fix already exists on paper: the bipartisan Secure Elections Act proposed eliminating paperless machines and mandating routine audits, yet adoption has been uneven across states rather than systemic.

First-order effects

  • Elections officials and voters in the fourteen paperless-machine states carry the direct exposure: any compromise of those devices would leave no auditable paper record to reconcile against.

Second-order effects

  • Machine vendors face mounting pressure as states that do replace equipment shift demand toward paper-trail systems, while counties stuck with aging fleets absorb rising maintenance costs on hardware already flagged as obsolete.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, US election integrity increasingly depends on state-by-state procurement decisions rather than federal standards, keeping the patchwork — and its weakest links — in place until legislation like the Secure Elections Act or audit mandates forces uniformity.

The trend: US election infrastructure is converging slowly toward verifiable paper trails, with the pace set by fragmented state budgets and procurement cycles rather than federal mandate.

Discussion

  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    Today, we're launching a major project that I've been working on for the past five months. It's a page that tracks every state and county using paperless voting machines, including whether they plan to upgrade and where they are in that process. https://www.politico.com/... pic.…
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    Five of the 14 states (DE, GA, LA, OK, and SC) run centralized processes where the state govt picks voting machines. Here are two examples of how we show those states. (DE was the first of the 14 states to fully upgrade to paper.) pic.twitter.com/te4SUqrJC5
  • @alexstamos Alex Stamos on x
    This is a fantastic resource, great job @ericgeller and @politico! https://twitter.com/...
  • @mikebfarrell Michael B. Farrell on x
    Many months of hard work by @ericgeller @beatricezjin & @JordynHermani went into tracking what states and counties are doing - and aren't - to make voting more secure ahead of 2020. See how your county stacks up. https://www.politico.com/...
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    We then break down the map of those 14 states by the status of each jurisdiction: upgraded to paper, in the process of upgrading, planning to upgrade, and not planning to upgrade. You'll notice how many counties either don't plan to upgrade or haven't respond to our outreach. pic…
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    We start by showing you a bunch of national maps, including the 36 states and D.C. that used paper in 2018 and the 14 states that were at least partially paperless. pic.twitter.com/95UGIH5yFZ
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    The other nine states let counties pick their own voting machines. Tracking those ~600 counties required tons of research, outreach, and prodding. pic.twitter.com/ybs3WvLWwx
  • @abalcerzak Ashley Balcerzak on x
    Tens of millions of Americans vote in states that use paperless voting machines — devices that security experts say can be undetectably hacked and offer no way to audit the results when errors occur. New Jersey is one of them, via @politico : https://www.politico.com/... pic.twi…
  • @politico @politico on x
    The U.S. faces a voting security crisis - but fixing this problem won't happen quickly. Explore our state-by-state look at the gaping weakness in the patchwork U.S. election system: https://politi.co/2KpgBum
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    For my Texas story, I spoke to experts in cybersecurity and election administration about why local officials like paperless machines and how that combines with other factors to make replacement difficult. https://www.politico.com/... pic.twitter.com/j0xTcgfXfS
  • @frankluntz Frank Luntz on x
    Hundreds of U.S. counties say they can't afford to buy new auditable voting machines, no matter how unsecure their current machines are. https://twitter.com/...