/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Asia Pacific spending on AI will reach $5.5B in 2019, up 80% YoY, and will reach $15B in 2022, led by the retail industry

Why Standards Are Critical to Improving Artificial Intelligence

IDC

Context & Ripple Effects

Two years after McKinsey counted US firms at 66% of global AI investment and China at 17%, IDC is putting a number on the rest of Asia Pacific: $5.5B in 2019, growing 80% YoY toward $15B by 2022. The notable detail is who leads — not tech firms doing R&D, as McKinsey found dominated earlier spending, but the retail industry buying applied systems.

The forecast also reads differently in hindsight: four years later, IDC's global spending forecast had grown to $154B for 2023 alone, meaning this regional projection was an early data point in a curve that kept being revised upward.

First-order effects

  • AI vendors selling into Asia Pacific get a demand signal anchored in a named vertical — retail — shifting their regional go-to-market from research partnerships toward deployable merchandising, inventory, and customer-facing systems.
  • Retailers across the region face a widening gap against early adopters as peer budgets compound at 80% annually.

Second-order effects

  • Regional systems integrators and cloud providers compete to capture implementation work, since vertical buyers like retailers buy outcomes rather than models — pulling services revenue ahead of software licensing in the region.
  • Vendors that concentrated sales capacity on US and Chinese tech buyers per the McKinsey-era distribution must staff Southeast Asian and other APAC markets or cede them to local competitors.

Third-order effects

  • The shift from tech-firm R&D spending (90% of the McKinsey-era total) to vertical operational budgets marks AI becoming a line item in ordinary P&Ls rather than a lab expense — the precondition for the much larger spending base IDC and others projected later.
  • Sustained regional adoption feeds the compute buildout that later coverage tied to thin vendor margins and a projected revenue shortfall against infrastructure costs, raising the question of whether vertical buyers' willingness to pay can fund the stack beneath them.

The trend: Enterprise AI spending is diffusing from US- and China-based tech firms into regional vertical industries, turning AI from an R&D bet into an operating cost that compounds year over year.