/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: in 2018, 889K+ users were attacked with banking Trojans, up ~16% YoY, while Android banking malware attacked ~1.8M users, up 300%+ YoY

Kaspersky Lab / Securelist :

Securelist Kaspersky Lab

Context & Ripple Effects

Mobile malware has been compounding for years — Kaspersky counted a 25% rise in infections across ~16M devices back in 2014, and its own telemetry showed Android ransomware nearly quadrupling month-over-month by April 2016 (136K customers hit). The 2018 numbers mark the point where that growth concentrated on money: banking-specific attacks are no longer a side category but the fastest-growing segment.

The asymmetry matters more than either figure alone. Desktop banking Trojans grew a steady ~16%, while Android banking malware tripled-plus in a single year — consistent with the earlier pattern of criminal groups like the ones behind the $300M bank-institution heists following account holders onto whatever device they actually bank from.

First-order effects

  • Roughly 1.8M Android users entered 2019 having had banking credentials or payment data targeted, and banks whose apps those credentials unlock inherit the fraud losses and customer-support burden immediately.

Second-order effects

  • Financial institutions are pushed to harden mobile channels — device attestation, in-app behavioral checks — because the attack surface has moved off the PC, where the ~16% Trojan growth shows the older playbook still works but scales slower.

Third-order effects

  • If the 300% trajectory reflects banking permanently shifting to phones, mobile becomes the primary battleground for financial malware — a path later borne out by campaigns like Drinik impersonating India's tax app across 18 banks — and puts sustained pressure on Google to treat banking-app integrity as a platform-security obligation rather than an app-vendor problem.

The trend: Financial malware is migrating from desktops to Android as banking itself goes mobile, with attack volumes tracking where the accounts live.