/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

EU report: tech firms are now assessing 89% of flagged content within 24 hours and 72% of such illegal hate speech is removed, up from 40% and 28% in 2016

Natasha Lomas / TechCrunch :

TechCrunch Natasha Lomas

Context & Ripple Effects

This report closes a three-year loop the Commission opened when its first audit found Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Microsoft reviewed only 40% of flagged hate speech within 24 hours. Successive rounds of published monitoring moved the number to 59%, then to a 70% removal rate reported a year earlier, and the 2019 figures — 89% assessed within a day, 72% removed — mark the high point of that voluntary code-of-conduct arc.

First-order effects

  • The signatory platforms gain breathing room: with the Commission's own data showing near-universal 24-hour assessment, the immediate case for legislating hate speech takedowns weakens.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

The trend: The EU's publish-the-numbers approach to platform content moderation is converting voluntary codes into the evidentiary groundwork for binding regulation.