/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: $5.3B was invested in cybersecurity companies in 2018, up 81% from 2016, with California alone accounting for 46% of VC investments worldwide

2018 wasn't all bad.  It turned out to be a record year for venture capital firms investing in cybersecurity companies.

TechCrunch Zack Whittaker

Context & Ripple Effects

This report lands mid-arc in a funding run the related coverage tracks end to end: after VCs put $3.7B into 272 security startups in 2015 and dipped to $3.1B across a record 279 deals in 2016, 2018's $5.3B marks an 81% jump from that trough — deal counts flattening while check sizes grow.

The geography is the sharper signal: California alone absorbs 46% of worldwide cybersecurity VC, meaning nearly half the category's global capital flows through one state's ecosystem — a concentration the later coverage extends, with global funding reaching $8.1B by 2020 before the exit wave.

First-order effects

  • California-based security founders gain privileged access to roughly half the world's cybersecurity venture dollars, while founders elsewhere compete for the remaining 54%.
  • Security startups raising in 2018 do so into a market where capital per company is rising even as the 2016 data showed deal counts plateauing — pricing power shifts toward sellers of equity.

Second-order effects

  • VCs outside California face a forced choice: pay up for Bay Area deals or chase less-contested geographies at lower valuations, spreading the category beyond its historic center.
  • A larger funded cohort sets up the downstream consolidation the corpus later records — 129 VC-backed security acquisitions in 2021, as strategics buy what VCs built.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — funding climbing from $3.1B in 2016 to $5.3B in 2018 to $8.1B in 2020 — cybersecurity hardens into a permanent top-tier VC allocation rather than a cyclical theme, with exit volume scaling alongside it.
  • Sustained single-state dominance of category capital entrenches a self-reinforcing cluster: talent, buyers, and follow-on investors concentrate where the checks already are, raising the bar for security hubs elsewhere.

The trend: Cybersecurity venture funding is compounding year over year while concentrating geographically, converting security from a episodic theme into a structurally over-funded category whose exit wave follows its funding wave.