/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Hands-on with Nike's $350 Bluetooth-enabled Adapt BB shoe with automated power-lacing, which will allow basketball players to change shoe tightness via an app

Nike's Adapt BB shoe has utility for pros, but is also a lens into a connected future  —  Why does the world need a self-lacing shoe?

TechCrunch Matthew Panzarino

Context & Ripple Effects

The Adapt BB is not a one-off gadget but the hardware end of a strategy Nike has been building for years: back in 2015 it was already pouring money into health tracking alongside Under Armour to forge direct data connections with customers and recommend products off exercise data. The self-lacing shoe gives that relationship a physical anchor — a $350 sneaker that stays tethered to Nike's app after purchase.

The competitive field is oddly open. Adidas closed its standalone digital sports unit in late 2017 to retreat behind Runtastic and its main app, while Google is approaching the same foot from the sensor side with Jacquard, an ML insole that reads a soccer player's footwork in real time. Nike's software stack keeps widening too, from the AR-based Nike Fit sizing app to the Celect acquisition for demand prediction.

First-order effects

  • Basketball players gain mid-game adjustability — tightness changed from a phone rather than by stopping to re-tie — at a $350 price point that positions the shoe as a pro tool first, consumer product second.
  • Every Adapt BB owner becomes a persistent telemetry source: fit preferences and usage now flow into the same customer-data apparatus Nike built its tracking investment around.

Second-order effects

  • Adidas' 2017 withdrawal from proprietary wearable tech leaves the connected-footwear lane to Nike unless it responds through partnerships or its app ecosystem instead of building hardware in-house.
  • Google's Jacquard insole shows the adjacent threat: if footwork analytics become a selling point, sensor makers can enter shoes as component suppliers, pressuring Nike to own more of the stack itself.

Third-order effects

  • Footwear is drifting from a sold-once good toward a platform — a sensor plus an app plus a data feed — which changes what a sneaker company must be good at and makes the customer relationship continuous rather than transactional.
  • If connected shoes normalize per-wearer data collection, expect fit, performance, and purchase recommendations to converge into one profile — the direction Nike Fit and Celect both point toward — with the attendant privacy questions that follow any always-connected product.

The trend: Athletic footwear is becoming a connected sensor platform where the ongoing data relationship with the wearer, not the shoe itself, is the product.