/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: 1,594 US startups received initial VC funding in the first 9 months of 2018, down 40% from 2015, while median seed round was $2M, ~4X the 2013 average

The result is a big increase in the size of some early-stage investments and valuations  —  It has been a fast ride …

Wall Street Journal Eliot Brown

Context & Ripple Effects

This WSJ report captures the moment US venture capital split into a barbell. In the same year PitchBook counted 102 startups raising at least $50M in Q1 alone, only 1,594 companies got a first check — down 40% from 2015 — while the median seed round quadrupled to $2M versus 2013. Money didn't leave early stage; it left most early-stage companies.

The pattern held after 2018: full-year US funding hit its highest level since 2000 in the fewest deals since 2013, and by 2020 a record $130B went out on a shrinking deal count. When the cycle turned, the thin end of the funnel broke first — Series A/B dollars fell 22% YoY in mid-2022 and angel/seed deal counts were down roughly half by Q2 2023.

First-order effects

  • Founders seeking a first check face a sharply narrower door: 40% fewer companies got initial funding than in 2015, so the marginal startup is pushed toward angels, accelerators, or bootstrapping instead of institutional seed.
  • The startups that do clear the bar raise materially more — a $2M median seed means bigger valuations and more dilution headroom for a select group, effectively moving Series A economics into the seed round.

Second-order effects

  • Capital concentrates at the other end of the barbell: with fewer entry points, funds chase proven companies, which is exactly what the record late-stage totals of 2018 and the record 2020 year reflect.
  • Seed investing professionalizes around the survivors — larger median checks favor funds that can write them, squeezing sub-$1M-check angels and micro-funds out of lead positions.

Third-order effects

  • If the structure holds, US venture becomes a tournament market: a small number of heavily capitalized winners per cohort and a long tail starved of institutional capital, which makes downturns like 2022–2023 cut earliest-stage deal flow disproportionately hard.
  • Entry-level entrepreneurship shifts financing burden away from VCs toward non-institutional sources, changing which kinds of companies get built — those that can reach traction without a first institutional check.

The trend: US venture capital is consolidating into fewer, larger checks at both ends of the stage spectrum, a barbell that has persisted from 2018 through the 2022–2023 pullback.