/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Study: Bitcoin daily transactions fell from ~360K in late 2017 to ~230K in Sept. 2018; transaction values fell from $3.7B+ to below $670M in the same period

- Declining daily transaction volume, values seen as negative  — Quarter-over-quarter transactions are seen plummeting again

Bloomberg Olga Kharif

Context & Ripple Effects

The study lands as a confirmation of what Chainalysis already showed for payment processors: the 17 largest crypto processing services saw inflows collapse from $412M in September 2017 to $69M by June 2018. Now the network-level numbers match — daily transactions down from ~360K to ~230K, and value moved down from over $3.7B to below $670M.

The decline isn't confined to Bitcoin itself. Chainalysis found Bitcoin Cash payments — pitched explicitly as the cheaper payments chain — fell from $10.5M in March to $3.7M in May, meaning the entire 'crypto as payments' thesis was contracting at once, not just the largest chain.

First-order effects

  • Crypto payment processors lose their revenue base almost entirely within a year — the same Chainalysis cohort that received $412M in September 2017 was down to $69M by mid-2018, and Q3 transactions are seen falling again quarter-over-quarter.

Second-order effects

  • Competing chains can't pick up the slack: Bitcoin Cash's own payment volume fell by roughly two-thirds between March and May 2018, so the payments use case offers no differentiation for either chain's value proposition.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern recurs across cycles — Bitcoin posted its worst quarter since Q3 2011 in mid-2022, and crypto trading volume dropped 63% from its February 2025 peak — suggesting activity metrics are driven by speculative flows rather than durable transactional demand, which is exactly what this 2018 study first quantified.

The trend: Each crypto cycle repeats the same shape: usage and volume metrics peak with prices and then contract far faster than the asset itself, exposing how thin real-world transactional demand is beneath the market.