/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Diar report: as Bitcoin mining revenues reach ~$5B in 2018, rising costs like electricity are making mining unprofitable for all but the biggest of players

Bitcoin (BTC) miner revenues for the first six months of 2018 have already surpassed results in 2017, but the miners themselves see little profit …

Cointelegraph Ana Berman

Context & Ripple Effects

Back in January, mining looked like a license to print money — Bloomberg reported Chinese miners stayed profitable as long as bitcoin held above $6,925 (that early-2018 profitability window). Ten months later, Diar's tally shows the flip side of scale: roughly $5B in first-half revenue, yet rising electricity and operating costs leave the margin almost entirely to the biggest operators.

The story matters because it marks the moment mining stops being a hobbyist business and becomes an industrial one — a pattern the coverage keeps confirming, from the 2020 halving prep spending to TheMinerMag's finding that median mining costs keep climbing quarter over quarter.

First-order effects

  • Small and mid-sized miners face shutdown or forced exit as electricity costs eat their thin margins, while large operators with cheap power and scale capture a growing share of the ~$5B revenue pool.
  • Diar's numbers turn mining profitability into a public benchmark, pressuring publicly traded and venture-backed mining firms whose unit economics now look worse than their headline revenues suggest.

Second-order effects

  • Unprofitable miners dumping equipment depresses the secondary market for rigs — the same dynamic behind efficient machines selling at ~$24 per 100 terahashes in late 2022 after the post-2021 hardware fire sales.
  • Mining migrates toward the cheapest power sources, concentrating demand in a few regions and pushing electricity prices up for local residents near large mine clusters, as later reporting on 34 US mines showed.

Third-order effects

  • If the cost curve keeps outrunning revenue per hash, mining consolidates structurally around industrial players — a trajectory visible in TheMinerMag's projection that median mining costs would hit $70K by Q2 2025, up from $52K in Q4 2024 (the continuing cost squeeze) — leaving scale and energy access as the only durable moats.
  • Concentrated, energy-hungry mining invites regulatory scrutiny and pushes surviving miners to reposition their sites as general compute infrastructure rather than pure bitcoin production.

The trend: Bitcoin mining is consolidating from a distributed, hobby-accessible activity into an industrial business where only operators with the cheapest power survive each cycle of rising costs and reward cuts.