/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Profile of Susquehanna, one of the first major Wall Street institutional investors to create a Bitcoin trading desk, as it looks to expand to more crypto assets

SAN FRANCISCO — While a number of large financial institutions have discussed trading Bitcoin, one firm has already begun doing it.

New York Times Nathaniel Popper

Context & Ripple Effects

The timing matters: in the same month this profile ran, Goldman Sachs announced it would open its own Bitcoin trading operation, and NYSE owner Intercontinental Exchange was reported building a platform that would let large investors buy and hold Bitcoin directly. Susquehanna is the counterpoint — a major firm that stopped discussing and started trading, and is now pushing past Bitcoin into additional crypto assets.

The gap it fills is real: as related coverage notes, crypto firms were largely shunned by big banks, leaving smaller players like Silvergate to capture that business. An established proprietary trading firm operating a desk signals that the [[concepts#crypto-legitimacy-gap|legitimacy gap]] between crypto markets and institutional finance is starting to close from the trading side.

First-order effects

  • Susquehanna gains a first-mover position in institutional crypto trading while rivals like Goldman Sachs are still weeks away from launching their own operations — its expansion into more assets widens that lead.

Second-order effects

  • Goldman's entry and ICE's platform build-out mean Susquehanna will soon compete for the same institutional flow, pressuring spreads and pushing all three toward broader asset coverage; crypto-native firms gain a second liquidity source beyond small banks like Silvergate.

Third-order effects

The trend: Wall Street's crypto engagement is progressing from talk to trading desks to full balance-sheet services, with each institutional entrant lowering the barrier for the next.