/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Crunchbase data shows VC investments in blockchain-related startups, excluding ICOs, reached $1.3B in 2018, exceeding investment totals of previous 18 months

Although bitcoin and blockchain technology may not take up quite as much mental bandwidth for the general public as it did just a few months ago …

TechCrunch Alex Wilhelm

Context & Ripple Effects

When Crunchbase last sized this market in March, it found that since January 2017 blockchain startups had raised roughly $4.5B via ICOs against only about $1.3B in traditional VC rounds — tokens were the dominant funding rail by nearly 3.5x ([[a:927252]]). This new data point marks the inflection: equity investors alone matched that entire 18-month VC total within the first months of 2018.

The significance is directional, not just volumetric. As public bitcoin enthusiasm cooled, institutional capital was still accelerating into the category — a pattern the rest of 2018 confirmed before reversing hard in 2019.

First-order effects

  • Blockchain founders now have two live funding channels at comparable scale, shifting deal dynamics from 'raise an ICO or raise equity' to negotiating between them — with VCs no longer the smaller pool.
  • Traditional VC firms that sat out 2017's token boom gain a route into the sector on their own terms, buying equity stakes without touching token structures.

Second-order effects

  • The acceleration held through the year: blockchain and crypto-focused startups went on to raise nearly $3.9B through VC in the first three quarters of 2018, up 280% YoY ([[a:934081]]) — meaning late-arriving funds were deploying into a market already near its peak.
  • That peak set up the bust: by Q1 2019 VC investment had fallen to $334M, back in line with 2017 levels ([[a:940338]]), leaving funds that entered at the 2018 top holding positions marked well below entry.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, blockchain venture funding behaves like a sentiment-coupled asset class rather than a steadily compounding one — CB Insights' mid-2019 tracking showed investment pacing toward a ~60% annual decline ([[a:943903]]) — forcing funds to underwrite crypto exposure with market-cycle risk models borrowed from trading desks, not classic venture stage math.

The trend: Venture capital's relationship with blockchain runs in boom-bust cycles keyed to crypto market sentiment, with each funding wave peaking faster than the last.