/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Behind the debate on whether the CFAA should be amended to allow private companies and citizens that are victims of cybercrimes to “hack back”

American companies that fall victim to data breaches want to retaliate against the culprits.  But can they do so without breaking the law? Tweets: @hatr , @ericgeller , and @malwaretechblog Tweets: @hatr : Great article on hacking back in the @NewYorker. Some private companies are dying to be legally allowed do it, but often don't realize what they might be up against http://www.newyorker.com/... http://twitter.com/... Eric Geller / @ericgeller : This New Yorker article about hacking back makes a point I hadn't considered: DOJ will likely never prosecute a company for it because no jury would convict. http://www.newyorker.com/... http://twitter.com/... MalwareTech / @malwaretechblog : This is something I've been saying for a long time. Hacking back is already a thing, many companies already do it, nobody gets prosecuted for it. No point making it “legal”. http://twitter.com/...

New Yorker Nicholas Schmidle