/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

New Jersey-based Basis, which aims to develop a “stable coin” that stays valued at ~$1 by altering supply, raises $133M from a16z, GV, Bain Capital, and others

If you own any Bitcoin, you're probably in the habit of watching its price fluctuate wildly.

TechCrunch Connie Loizos

Context & Ripple Effects

Basis's $133M round is one of the largest bets of the 2018 stablecoin wave, and it was pre-structured as token sales: an SEC filing shows Intangible Labs had already raised $125M via a SAFT offering under the earlier Basecoin name days before this announcement. The thesis is algorithmic — hold the peg near $1 by expanding and contracting supply rather than holding dollar reserves.

The bet's fate is already part of the record: within eight months, sources reported Basis shutting down over regulatory issues and returning most of the capital, with the team later confirming the wind-down and full $133M return. That makes this raise the clearest case study in how securities law, not market demand, killed the algorithmic-stablecoin model.

First-order effects

  • a16z, GV, and Bain Capital commit $133M to an unlaunched protocol whose core asset is a supply-adjustment algorithm, with most exposure flowing through SAFT token rights rather than equity.
  • Basis gains the largest war chest among algorithmic stablecoin projects, letting it hire through a token launch that its own SAFT structure ties directly to US securities rules.

Second-order effects

  • The eventual shutdown forces blue-chip funds to reprice algorithmic-peg designs as unregulatable, pushing stablecoin capital toward reserve-backed issuers and infrastructure instead.
  • Competing stablecoin teams inherit both Basis's talent and its cautionary tale, shifting their structures toward compliance-first designs before raising.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, stablecoin value migrates down the stack: seven years on, infrastructure names like Zerohash raising ~$100M at a ~$1B valuation and new chains like Stable's stablecoin-focused Layer 1 attract the capital that once went to peg algorithms.
  • Algorithmic supply adjustment becomes a structurally disfavored design in US markets, leaving dollar-reserve models as the default and making regulatory posture the primary screening criterion for stablecoin investors.

The trend: Stablecoin investment is migrating from algorithmic peg protocols toward regulated reserves and infrastructure, with Basis's raise-and-return arc marking the turning point.