/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: US households using only over-the-top streaming services nearly tripled since 2013 to 14.1M but still represent just 11% of all TV households

The number of U.S. households using only over-the-top streaming services to access TV programming and movies has nearly tripled over the past five years …

TechCrunch Sarah Perez

Context & Ripple Effects

This 2018 measurement lands mid-arc in the cord-cutting story the related coverage traces end to end. Back in 2015, Nielsen counted 36% of US households on Netflix and under 7% on Hulu Plus as traditional TV time was already slipping; by 2017, comScore found over half of Wi-Fi homes using at least one OTT service. The new figure converts that adoption curve into outright replacement: 14.1M households now get TV exclusively from streaming.

What keeps the number in perspective is what came after it: pure-play live-TV bundles like Sling TV and DirecTV Now were still reaching only 5% of Wi-Fi households as of mid-2018, and by 2020 the top nine streamers' combined growth had pushed average households to 3.1 stacked subscriptions rather than full cable replacement — with free over-the-air broadcast homes also growing alongside.

First-order effects

  • Traditional pay-TV distributors lose their most price-sensitive subscribers first: at 11% of TV households, streaming-only homes are no longer a rounding error but a measurable churn line on every quarterly earnings call.
  • Streaming services gain a defined segment — the fully converted household — whose needs (live news, sports, local channels) expose exactly where pure-play catalogs fall short of the cable bundle they replaced.

Second-order effects

  • Virtual MVPDs like Sling TV and DirecTV Now become the compromise product for households that want to cut the cord without going streaming-only, competing directly against both legacy cable and the Netflix-style services that pulled viewers away.
  • Broadcasters and antenna makers get a second wind: Nielsen's finding that over-the-air homes grew 48% suggests a meaningful slice of defectors recombine free broadcast with streaming rather than paying anyone for linear TV.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, pay-TV's decline stops being a subscriber story and becomes a bundling story — the 2020 data showing households averaging 3.1 subscriptions points to an industry where aggregators who assemble streaming bundles capture the margin cable operators once did.
  • Measurement itself becomes contested ground: as viewing fragments across OTT, OTA, and stacked services, the Nielsen/comScore duopoly's definitions of a 'TV household' increasingly determine how ad dollars and renewal negotiations get priced.

The trend: US television is shifting from one bundled subscription per home to a fragmented stack of streaming services plus free broadcast, with cord-cutting accelerating from niche to mainstream between 2013 and 2020.