/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Salon tests alternative to advertising by offering visitors who use ad-blocking tools an option that allows the site to mine Monero using readers' computers

Do you use an ad blocker?  That's cool — just let us use your computer's processing power to mine cryptocurrencies.

Financial Times Adam Samson

Context & Ripple Effects

Salon's experiment takes a practice that until now lived in the shadows and makes it explicit: five months after [[a:922499|Adblock Plus shipped a filter blocking sites from covertly mining cryptocurrency on visitors' machines]], Salon asks ad-block users to consent to exactly that — Monero mining instead of ads. The choice of coin matters: Monero's privacy features have already made it the payment rail of choice for ransomware gangs, so any publisher adopting it inherits that association.

The test also sits inside a longer arc of non-advertising monetization experiments, from Brave's Bitcoin-based Payments rewarding sites directly to PageFair's ad-blocking middleware being hacked into pushing malware across 500+ sites — each attempt to route money to publishers around the display-ad pipeline has carried its own trust burden.

First-order effects

  • Ad-blocking Salon readers face a new trade-off — view ads or donate processor cycles — while Salon gains a revenue line that bypasses ad networks entirely.
  • Adblock Plus's anti-mining filter now confronts a consent-based case: its blocklist logic was built for covert cryptojacking, and an opt-in miner forces a distinction between hijacking and disclosed use.

Second-order effects

  • Other ad-dependent publishers will watch Salon's opt-in rates as a signal for whether reader-supplied compute can offset blocked impressions, potentially normalizing mining clauses in visitor agreements.
  • Anti-mining tooling and browsers must evolve consent UIs — distinguishing disclosed miners from Coinhive-style covert scripts — or risk blocking a model publishers argue is legitimate.

Third-order effects

  • Salon's bet is exposed to forces publishers don't control: Coinhive's shutdown a year later, citing the crypto crash and a Monero hard fork, showed browser-mining economics collapse when coin prices fall or protocols change under them.
  • If consent-based mining proves viable where covert mining failed, publisher monetization structurally diversifies beyond advertising into reader-supplied resources — attention, payments, and now compute — with each channel carrying its own regulatory and trust surface.

The trend: Publishers are testing reader-funded alternatives to display advertising — Brave's tip-based payments, Salon's CPU mining — but their viability tracks cryptocurrency markets more than media economics.