/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Bloomberg research: ridesharing startups raised $28B in 2017 despite tougher regulations in many places, boosted by Softbank's investments in Uber, Ola, Didi

Mark Chediak / Skift :

Skift Mark Chediak

Context & Ripple Effects

The $28B that ridesharing startups pulled in during 2017 was not evenly sourced: SoftBank sat on both sides of the biggest rounds, including Ola's $2B raise alongside Tencent, after backing Uber and Didi as well. That continues a pattern from 2015, when Uber and Didi each raised billion-plus rounds in China and Ola took $500M explicitly to defend its lead over Uber in India.

First-order effects

  • SoftBank's checks became the marginal source of growth capital for Uber, Ola and Didi, letting all three keep spending on subsidies and expansion even as local regulators tightened rules in many markets.

Second-order effects

  • Rivals had to match the pace of these mega-rounds or cede share — Ola's earlier $500M raise at a $5B valuation was framed directly as keeping its lead over Uber — pushing valuations up faster than unit economics could justify.

Third-order effects

  • The concentration hardened into structure: SoftBank later moved $20B+ of ride-hailing stakes into its Vision Fund ([[a:928894]]), and by late 2018 Japanese firms held at least $13B combined in US ride-hailing startups, meaning a handful of investors now sit across competing platforms rather than picking winners.

The trend: Ride-hailing is consolidating around a few sovereign-scale investors whose cross-portfolio stakes span rival platforms, making fundraising totals less about market enthusiasm than about one backer's balance sheet.