/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

PitchBook: all-female founding teams received ~2.2% of $85B total invested by VCs in 2017, up from 1.9% in 2016, as all-male founding teams received ~79%

giving men a leg up when it comes to raising funds” - just 2% of 2017's VC funding went to women-led co's http://fortune.com/... Jodi Jahic / @jodij : Sobering statistics, but @kmlake is right: in a cash-constrained environment, founders must deeply consider how their business will be healthy and sustainable. Which is a good thing. @valzarya http://fortune.com/... Karen Appleton Page / @karenappleton : Guys—you make up 96% of VCs, can we talk? What are you leaving on the table here? Female founders got 2% of venture capital dollars in 2017 http://for.tn/2BdLfjU via @FortuneMagazine

Fortune Valentina Zarya

Context & Ripple Effects

The 2017 PitchBook numbers land mid-arc: Karen Appleton Page's public challenge to a VC corps that is 96% male, and Jodi Jahic's counterpoint that constrained capital forces founders to prove sustainability, frame the debate that follows. A year later, PitchBook and All Raise put 2018's total for US female founders at $2.88B across 482 teams, with average deals for women-led companies at $5.9M versus $17.3M for men — the dollar-gap behind the percentage gap.

First-order effects

  • With all-male founding teams taking ~79% of the $85B deployed in 2017, allocation power sits almost entirely with the male-dominated partnership Karen Appleton Page addresses directly, and female founders compete for a pool measured in single-digit percentages.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • A decade of measurement shows the all-female-team share barely moves — Crunchbase found it stuck at 2.3% in 2021 — while gains instead accrue through mixed founding teams and rising female cofounder rates among unicorns, suggesting the structural fix runs through who sits on the investing side, not founder composition alone.

The trend: Venture capital's gender funding gap is proving sticky at the all-female-team level, with incremental progress arriving via mixed teams and more female partners rather than a shift in how all-female startups get funded.

Discussion

  • @rossbaird Ross Baird on x
    Female founders got 2% of venture capital last year. That's a statistical impossibility-bias is at work. If you have a financial advisor, ask where your funds are invested. Or ask your university's endowment. The fund managers won't change until you care. http://fortune.com/...
  • @ebboyd E.B. Boyd on x
    “women tend to be judged on performance and men on potential—giving men a leg up when it comes to raising funds” - just 2% of 2017's VC funding went to women-led co's http://fortune.com/...
  • @jodij Jodi Jahic on x
    Sobering statistics, but @kmlake is right: in a cash-constrained environment, founders must deeply consider how their business will be healthy and sustainable. Which is a good thing. @valzarya http://fortune.com/...
  • @karenappleton Karen Appleton Page on x
    Guys—you make up 96% of VCs, can we talk? What are you leaving on the table here? Female founders got 2% of venture capital dollars in 2017 http://for.tn/2BdLfjU via @FortuneMagazine