/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

EU fines Qualcomm €997M for abusing market dominance, says it paid Apple to buy LTE baseband chipsets from Qualcomm exclusively; Qualcomm to appeal

The European Commission has fined Qualcomm €997m for abusing its market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets.

EU Press Room

Context & Ripple Effects

This €997M penalty is the European Commission's opening shot in a multi-year campaign against Qualcomm's baseband-chipset business, arriving months after Taiwan's FTC imposed a $773M fine for at least seven years of antitrust violations and South Korea's regulator fined the company over $850M for tying overly broad patent royalties to modem chip sales.

The Commission doubled down a year and a half later with a €242M fine for selling 3G baseband chips below cost to squeeze out Icera — but the judicial arc ran the other way: the EU's General Court ultimately annulled the 2018 fine, regulators chose not to appeal, and a court later ordered the Commission to pay €786K of Qualcomm's legal costs.

First-order effects

  • Qualcomm takes a near-€1B financial hit and commits to an appeal that will freeze the fine's finality for years, while Apple's exclusive LTE baseband purchasing arrangement is publicly recast as the product of alleged payments rather than chip merit.

Second-order effects

  • Emboldened by the LTE case, the Commission extends its theory of harm to pricing conduct itself, fining Qualcomm again for below-cost 3G chip sales aimed at forcing Icera out of the market.

Third-order effects

  • When the General Court sides with Qualcomm and the Commission declines to appeal, the precedent raises the evidentiary bar for treating exclusivity payments as abusive dominance — and forces enforcers to absorb litigation costs, shifting the risk calculus for future chipset-market cases.

The trend: Global antitrust authorities converged on Qualcomm's modem-chipset practices through 2016–2019, but Europe's courts have since narrowed how far dominance findings can reach into exclusive-supply deals.

Discussion

  • @danieldancrane Daniel A. Crane on x
    Intel fined €1 billion for excluding AMD. Qualcomm fined €1 billion for excluding Intel. Up next: AMD to be fined €1 billion for excluding Qualcomm. http://techcrunch.com/... via @techcrunch
  • @bzamayo Benjamin Mayo on x
    The EU suggests Apple would have adopted Intel baseband chips in iPhones sooner if not for these ‘anti-competitive’ payments. http://twitter.com/...
  • @eu_commission European Commission on x
    Today, we fine Qualcomm €997m for abusing its market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets → http://europa.eu/!Mw98Kx http://twitter.com/...
  • @eu_competition EU Competition on x
    Qualcomm signed an agreement with Apple, committing to make significant payments to Apple on condition that the company would exclusively use Qualcomm chipsets in its iPhones and iPads http://europa.eu/...
  • @robinwauters Robin Wauters on x
    It's actually €997M and it makes you wonder why they didn't simply make it €1B (it's 4.9% of Qualcomm's 2017 turnover). http://twitter.com/...