/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Three interrelated macro themes dominated this year in tech: the breakout of crypto, beginning of the end of white male dominance, and the backlash against tech

As has become my practice, I celebrate the end of a year and the start of a new one here at AVC with back to back posts focusing …

AVC Fred Wilson

Context & Ripple Effects

This is AVC's annual year-end theme-setting post, part of a series that stretches back at least to its look at 2014's major technology trends — a ritual where the blog converts a year of observations into a small number of macro claims for its investor and founder audience.

What makes the 2017 edition notable in hindsight is how two of its three themes — the backlash against tech and the erosion of white male dominance — read as early warnings: the following year's coverage records antitrust investigations, consumer protests against big companies, and tough IPOs, while the decade-end reckoning in the 2010s takeaways treats the era's assumptions, like capital as a moat, as having failed.

First-order effects

  • Crypto's breakout moves it from fringe bet to a category the venture community AVC addresses must hold a position on, raising the cost of sitting out for funds and founders without exposure.
  • Naming the backlash and the decline of white male dominance as dominant themes hands critics, employees, and regulators a widely-read framing for pressures the industry was already facing.

Second-order effects

  • Competing outlets' year-end roundups — such as Vox's 2019 list marking antitrust investigations and consumer protests — institutionalize the same scorecard, turning one blogger's themes into a shared industry narrative that companies must answer to.
  • A mainstreamed crypto thesis pulls adjacent capital and talent toward token-based projects, pressuring traditional equity-stage investors to defend their model just as the decade-end coverage declares capital-as-a-moat dead.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, annual retrospectives shift from celebrating breakout categories to auditing the industry's externalities — a self-correcting record that preceded both the 2019 regulatory turn and the structural reassessment of how tech value is created.
  • Sustained backlash plus eroding demographic dominance points toward an industry whose legitimacy, hiring pool, and funding norms are all contested at once — the conditions under which regulation becomes the default constraint on platform growth rather than the exception.

The trend: Tech's annual theme-setting has evolved from cataloguing breakout categories into auditing the industry's costs — speculative manias, homogeneity, and eroding public trust — with each year's list feeding the next year's reckoning.

Discussion

  • @jrlevine Jake Levine on x
    The smartest people I know are quick to admit they have no idea what's going to happen in crypto in the short/medium term. If someone pretends to... approach with caution. http://twitter.com/...
  • @ia @ia on x
    “Human beings don't want to be controlled by machines. And we are increasingly being controlled by machines. [...] This is likely to be the narrative of the next thirty years.” http://avc.com/...
  • @pahlkadot Jennifer Pahlka on x
    I love that @fredwilson calls for “a social safety net that allows for a peaceful radical transformation of what work is in the 21st century” in his platform. Strongly agree. And @codeforamerica is trying to build one. http://avc.com/...
  • @broukhim Michael Broukhim on x
    Crypto-blockchain enabled decentralized apps is Internet 3.0 ... 20 years from now a whole generation will be saying “I wish I was alive when...” http://twitter.com/...
  • @cindygallop Cindy Gallop on x
    “Women and minorities are also signing up in droves to do public service, to run for office, to start companies, to start VC firms, to lead our society. & they will.” @fredwilson http://avc.com/... Because together, none of us are ‘minorities’. We're the majority. #diversity
  • @mdudas Mike Dudas on x
    @fredwilson “We are addicted to our phones, fed information by algorithms we don't understand, at risk of losing our jobs to robots. This is likely to be the narrative of the next thirty years. How do we cope with this?” ~ @fredwilson http://avc.com/... http://twitter.com/...
  • @girardinl Lauren Girardin on x
    “Tech is the new Wall Street, full of ultra rich out of touch people who have too much power and not enough empathy.” http://twitter.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    It seems to me any ‘tech backlash’ is dominated by a Facebook (and to some extent Google via YouTube) backlash. And a lot of that is is a ‘you got Trump elected’ backlash.
  • @semil @semil on x
    Poignant 2017 review by @fredwilson focuses on 1/ work needed in crypto infrastructure, 2/ end of white mail dominance + 3/ a tech backlash that could go much deeper: http://avc.com/... (always a must read & re-read)
  • @fredwilson Fred Wilson on x
    “2017 brought us many interesting things, but these three stories dominated the macro environment in tech this year. And they are related to each other in the sense that each is a reaction to power structures that are increasingly unsustainable.” http://avc.com/...