/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A look at how hate groups have built their own financing platforms, after being largely pushed off mainstream crowdfunding sites

Erin Carson / CNET : See also Mediagazer , Thanks: @rogerwcheng

CNET Erin Carson

Context & Ripple Effects

This piece is an early snapshot of a financing cat-and-mouse game the related coverage tracks for years afterward. When mainstream platforms cut off far-right networks — Google's removal of Gab's app coincided with Gab claiming $1M+ raised via crowdfunding — the money didn't disappear; it moved to channels built or tolerated outside mainstream moderation.

First-order effects

  • Deplatformed groups lose access to established payment rails and must either build their own fundraising infrastructure or route through sympathetic alternatives like the Christian-oriented GiveSendGo.
  • Equity crowdfunding under the Jobs Act of 2012 emerges as a workaround: Gab's two StartEngine-brokered rounds raised $2M, keeping it financially viable despite app-store and processor bans.

Second-order effects

  • Enforcement lags policy — three years after this article, research found US-based hate groups still raising funds on Stripe, PayPal, Facebook, and Amazon despite those platforms' stated rules against them.
  • Hosting-layer scrutiny follows the money: an investigation found 151 tech firms including GoDaddy, Cloudflare, Google, and Amazon providing DNS, CDN, or hosting to hate-spreading sites, pushing the moderation question upstream of crowdfunding entirely.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, content-moderation pressure migrates from consumer apps to the financial and infrastructure layers — payment processors, registrars, brokers like StartEngine — where a handful of companies hold chokepoint power over which movements can raise money at all.
  • Demonetized movements of any ideology learn the same playbook: vaccine skeptics later repeated it on GiveSendGo and GoFundMe after YouTube demonetization, normalizing a parallel fundraising economy that sits beyond mainstream platform policy.

The trend: Platform deplatforming is shifting extremist and fringe financing from mainstream rails toward self-built and ideologically aligned funding channels, making payments and infrastructure providers the next enforcement battleground.