/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: Google prepares to launch fully autonomous taxi service by 2018, maybe in Phoenix suburb, amid lingering issues with software, like making left turns

if it can get the cars to turn left

The Information Amir Efrati

Context & Ripple Effects

In October 2017, The Information reported that Google's self-driving unit was preparing a fully autonomous taxi service targeted for 2018, possibly in a Phoenix suburb — with the caveat that unsolved software problems, notably unprotected left turns, stood between the plan and reality. A month later the company put the first piece of that plan on the road, offering free rides in fully driverless cars in Phoenix while deferring any paid service.

What followed reads as a case study in the gap between launching and scaling: a 2018 launch announcement, then a late-2020 look at the Chandler operation showing it worked but still ran only about 100 rides a week with cars capped at 45 mph, before Waymo pushed beyond Arizona toward fully autonomous San Francisco rides without safety drivers in 2022.

First-order effects

  • Waymo's earliest Phoenix riders get a genuinely driverless car, but the left-turn problem means the initial fleet operates inside a geographically and behaviorally narrow envelope rather than as an open taxi service.

Second-order effects

  • As the launch approaches, critics and local officials press on the absence of regulation and transparency around driverless testing in Phoenix, making public oversight part of the rollout itself.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, robotaxis expand city-by-city at capped speeds and limited volumes for years — commercial scale arriving long after the technical milestone of removing the driver, with regulators shaping where each new market opens.

The trend: Autonomous ride-hailing is advancing through narrow, regulator-sensitive pilot markets — Phoenix first, then further cities — where removing the driver proves far easier than turning a pilot into a scaled taxi business.