/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Geekbench benchmarks: Apple's A11 Bionic is 25% faster in single core and 80% faster in multicore than A10 Fusion, beats i5 MacBook Pro and all other phones

Daniel Eran Dilger / AppleInsider :

AppleInsider Daniel Eran Dilger

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple's chip story has become an annual benchmark ritual: last September the company claimed its A10 Fusion was 40% faster than the A9 on the strength of its big.LITTLE core pairing, and each fall since has brought a new generation with fresh Geekbench numbers. The A11 Bionic's scores are the first independent confirmation of that cadence rather than a vendor claim.

What makes these numbers matter beyond the spec sheet is where they land: a phone SoC now outruns the i5 in Apple's own MacBook Pro line on Geekbench, a gap that foreshadows the M1 later topping every previous Mac in single-core Geekbench even under x86 emulation.

First-order effects

  • iPhone 8 and iPhone X buyers get a device whose Geekbench single-core score beats every shipping phone and Apple's own i5 MacBook Pro, collapsing the performance hierarchy between Apple's phone and laptop lines.
  • AppleInsider's read of the numbers hands Apple a marketing asset it didn't have with the A10, which rested on vendor-supplied percentage claims rather than independent cross-device benchmarks.

Second-order effects

  • Android flagship makers are forced to answer on Geekbench terms each fall, turning third-party benchmark deltas — not spec-sheet percentages — into the public scoreboard for Qualcomm, Samsung, and HiSilicon silicon.
  • A phone chip outscoring a MacBook Pro i5 puts internal pressure on Apple's Intel-dependent Mac line, making the case for running Mac hardware on Apple-designed cores.

Third-order effects

  • If the year-over-year gains hold — A10's claimed 40%, A11's measured 25% single-core and 80% multicore — mobile-derived Apple silicon keeps compounding until it competes with x86 incumbents in PCs, which is exactly the endpoint the M1 Geekbench results later confirm.
  • Benchmark leadership shifting from PC processors to phone SoCs restructures the industry around ARM-style designs, leaving x86 vendors defending the segments Apple hasn't yet entered.

The trend: Apple's annual SoC cadence is compounding phone-class performance past PC processors, setting up the transition from Intel Macs to Apple Silicon.