/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Kik raises $50M through private sale of its Kin token to institutional investors and plans to raise $75M more in ICO

Jonathan Keane / CoinDesk :

CoinDesk Jonathan Keane

Context & Ripple Effects

Kik's Kin announcement in May 2017 set out to make a cryptocurrency the primary transaction currency inside the app, built on Ethereum. This raise is the financing leg of that pivot: Kin was announced as an Ethereum-based token, and now Kik is selling $50M of it directly to institutional investors before opening a planned $75M public ICO.

The structure matters because Kik is a consumer messaging company, not a protocol startup — two years earlier it took $50M from Tencent at a $1B valuation as an equity play, and this token sale marks a different funding model entirely. The path from here runs through the SEC: the sale eventually drew a multi-year legal fight that ended in a court-approved $5M fine against Kik.

First-order effects

  • Institutional investors get Kin at a negotiated price before retail buyers, giving them a head start on the token that Kik intends to make the app's sole transaction currency.
  • Kik banks $50M immediately with a further $75M planned, effectively replacing venture equity with token proceeds as its operating capital.

Second-order effects

  • Selling to institutions first, then the public, put the sale squarely in securities-law territory — the SEC dispute that followed forced Kik into a three-year battle resolved only by the $5M settlement.
  • Rival consumer apps watching the raise had to weigh whether in-app tokens were a monetization edge or a regulatory liability; Kik's outcome became the cautionary data point.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, consumer-app token raises get priced not just on adoption but on expected enforcement risk — the Kik settlement established that even a completed, widely sold token can be retroactively treated as an unregistered security.
  • The episode pushes app developers toward either compliant structures or, as Kik itself attempted with its Ethereum-Stellar hybrid blockchain, building infrastructure designed around the token rather than bolting one onto an existing product.

The trend: Consumer internet companies are experimenting with raising capital through their own in-app tokens instead of equity, with securities regulators emerging as the decisive constraint on the model.