A group of lawyers has documented 533 cases of AI misuse in legal filings, including fabricated case law citations; judges and bar associations permit AI use
More lawyers are using artificial intelligence to write legal briefs. Some colleagues are publicizing the A.I.-generated errors.
Vigilante lawyers have documented a rising amount of low-quality AI-generated text in court filings, raising questions about accuracy and authenticity in legal documents.
Judges and bar associations certainly shouldn't be allowing AI use if qualified human lawyers aren't checking the results. — And with over 500 cases of AI misuse, clearly continuing legal education is failing on this issue. [embedded post]
Lawyers are submitting court filings full of AI hallucinations. This implies they're either too lazy to check the AI's work or too incompetent to do it. If all they do is ask ChatGPT for an answer and can't even tell when it's wrong, why are you paying them? — They are making…
It's interesting that LLM slop has been proliferating in legal circles and science academic publishing - but not so far in the humanities. I assume it's because fewer people use it, but also because the close-reading ethos of the humanities makes it unthinkable. — www.nytimes.…