/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Blackstone President Jonathan Gray says AI risk is “top of our list” when evaluating deals; sources: the firm backed down from buying companies vulnerable to AI

“People say, ‘This smells like a bubble,’” but they're not asking: 'What about legacy businesses that could be massively disrupted?'" he said. …

Financial Times

Context & Ripple Effects

Blackstone's more cautious approach to vulnerable operating-company targets sits alongside its participation in the asset-manager push into AI data centers, exposing a split between financing AI buildout and owning businesses AI could displace.

Related coverage later showed private capital firms acting on the same concern: Apollo cut software exposure and developed a sector-by-sector AI-susceptibility framework. This makes AI disruption a deal-underwriting issue rather than solely a technology-market narrative.

First-order effects

  • Blackstone can reject or rework prospective acquisitions whose earnings appear exposed to AI substitution, narrowing the pool of targets it will pursue.
  • Management teams seeking Blackstone capital face more scrutiny of how durable their products, pricing and customer relationships remain under AI adoption.

Second-order effects

  • Other private-equity buyers may need to formalize AI-disruption diligence to compete for resilient assets and avoid taking risks peers have screened out.
  • Targets judged more AI-exposed could face weaker buyer demand or tougher financing and valuation discussions, while firms with credible adaptation plans gain relative appeal.

Third-order effects

  • If this approach spreads, private-market valuations may increasingly separate businesses by AI resilience rather than treating an industry’s cash flows as broadly comparable.
  • The emerging use of explicit susceptibility frameworks could make AI-risk assessment a standard feature of underwriting, though the persistence of these discounts will depend on whether disruption translates into operating results.

The trend: AI is becoming a two-sided private-capital theme: investors are financing the infrastructure buildout while tightening diligence on businesses that AI may erode.

Discussion

  • @robmajteles Rob Majteles on x
    True, but if Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption, how do we categorize its wilful comatose state on climate disruption? “Blackstone says Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption” https://www.ft.com/...
  • @louiscyprien L.C. on x
    Blackstone says Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption “We've told our credit and equity teams: address AI on the first pages of your investment memos” https://www.ft.com/... via @ft
  • @omarwaraich Omar Waraich on x
    Blackstone says Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption: “[T]he scale of the technology's impact meant investors may still underestimate its potential to crush entire industries.” https://www.ft.com/...
  • @schaeffers @schaeffers on x
    Jonathan Gray of $BX warns investors are underestimating AI's disruption. Blackstone steering clear of automation-exposed sectors (software, call centers) & doubling down on data-infra, energy & industrial. “Acting like it's business as usual would be a mistake.” [image]
  • @antoinegara Antoine Gara on x
    Assessing AI risks in deals and private loans has risen to the top of Blackstone's priorities, Jonathan Gray told our Private Capital conference in London this week. Of course, there's also the risk of missing out as Wall St weighs the looming disruption. https://www.ft.com/...
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on bluesky
    Blackstone's president has said their top consideration when doing new investment deals is how likely the company or industry will be disrupted by AI.  —  “People say, ‘This smells like a bubble,’” but they're not asking: 'What about legacy businesses that could be massively disr…