/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

a16z, OpenAI's Greg Brockman, and others launch Leading the Future, a pro-AI super PAC network with $100M+ in funding, hoping to emulate crypto PAC Fairshake

Venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI President Greg Brockman are among those helping launch and fund Leading the Future

Wall Street Journal

Context & Ripple Effects

Leading the Future’s launch brought a16z, Greg Brockman and other backers into organized electoral advocacy around AI policy, explicitly using crypto PAC Fairshake as a reference point. Subsequent coverage showed the effort surpassing $125 million in 2025, while later filings identified $25 million from Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz as a major source of its cash position.

The network became a fault line within the AI ecosystem rather than a single-industry campaign vehicle: OpenAI said Brockman’s backing was personal, and OpenAI employees later supported a rival PAC seeking stricter AI rules.

First-order effects

  • Leading the Future gains a large initial funding base to build a pro-AI political-operation network, giving its backers a vehicle to influence candidates and the federal AI-regulation debate.
  • a16z and Brockman become publicly associated with a coordinated policy agenda; OpenAI’s later statement that it made no super-PAC contributions separates the company from Brockman’s activity.

Second-order effects

  • Candidates and policymakers face a better-funded pro-AI advocacy channel, increasing pressure on other AI firms, investors and civil-society groups to clarify or organize their own regulatory positions.
  • The later emergence of a stricter-rules counterpart shows that AI-policy politics can split even closely connected industry constituencies, shifting the debate from broad support for AI toward competition over what rules should govern it.

Third-order effects

  • If durable, AI development will be shaped not only by labs, investors and regulators but by standing electoral organizations that can reward or challenge policy positions across election cycles.
  • The pattern points toward more state-mediated AI governance, with the practical terms of regulation increasingly contested through political fundraising as well as technical and legislative processes.

The trend: AI policy is becoming a sustained electoral-finance arena in which competing industry and worker-aligned groups seek to shape the regulatory environment around frontier systems.

Discussion

  • @bradrcarson Brad Carson on x
    The battle has always been whether we can think clearly about the future and act on that thinking before the money comes in and makes the public interest irrelevant. This is what happened in social media. Not for the better.
  • @deliprao @deliprao on x
    Over the past years, the broader AI community has increasingly adopted crypto-like mores (memes, shitposts, hypeapalooza), so this is a logical next step.
  • @luke_metro @luke_metro on x
    our electricity bills are going up aren't they
  • @ednewtonrex Ed Newton-Rex on x
    Huge amounts of money are being spent lobbying to deregulate AI. This is because AI companies & VCs know the public overwhelmingly supports AI regulation. Politicians must resist the money and side with the public. https://www.wsj.com/... [image]
  • @danfaggella Daniel Faggella on x
    i don't think everyone who takes agi risk seriously should entirely lament this 1 - for agi gov to stick it seems likely it would have to be international coordination in some way 2 - “avoiding a patchwork of state laws” seems good doens't sound entirely reckless imo
  • @peterwildeford Peter Wildeford on x
    “Obviously we'd aggressively support all regulation” Obviously [image]
  • @shakeelhashim Shakeel on x
    Mask off moment for OpenAI, really
  • @schwartzbwsj Brian Schwartz on x
    NEW: Silicon Valley is putting more than $100 million into a network of PACs and organizations to advocate against strict artificial-intelligence regulations. It's the first AI political network set to make waves in 2026 midterms. W/ @AmrithRamkumar https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @seanokane Sean O'Kane on bluesky
    imagine spending money on literally anything else that directly helps people instead of an unproven intermediate technology that maybe someday might effect the same change but enriches a certain group of people nonetheless even if it fails.  couldn't be silicon valley!  [embedded…
  • @justinhendrix Justin Hendrix on bluesky
    “Silicon Valley is putting more than $100 million into a network of political-action committees and organizations to advocate against strict artificial-intelligence regulations, a signal that tech executives will be active in next year's midterm elections.”  [embedded post]
  • @jjvincent James Vincent on bluesky
    A Silicon Valley network of super-PACs has raised $100 million to “advocate against strict artificial-intelligence regulations.”  —  amazing how AI — despite not yet living up to its technical promises — is beginning to dominate US politics and the economy  —  www.wsj.com/politic…