/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An internal policy doc shows Meta permitted its chatbots to engage in provocative behavior; Meta removed some examples, including romantic roleplay with kids

An internal Meta policy document, seen by Reuters, reveals the social-media giant's rules for chatbots, which have permitted provocative behavior …

Reuters Jeff Horwitz

Discussion

  • @ryanlcooper.com Ryan Cooper on bluesky
    Facebook is probably up there with oil and tobacco companies in terms of net harm to human society [embedded post]
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on bluesky
    “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.”  Meta removed that language from its internal guidelines after I raised it.  —  AI experts worry financial incentives will blur the line between human relationships and bot engagement.  —  www.reu…
  • @emilymbender Emily M. Bender on bluesky
    To recap: Meta is pushing “AI companions”, because Zuck see a “market” for artificial friends.  They have a large workforce “training” these chatbots, presumably doing content-moderation style work, according to guidelines.  —  www.reuters.com/investigates...  >> [image]
  • @papapishu @papapishu on bluesky
    Oh come on. www.reuters.com/investigates...  [embedded post]
  • @mtsw @mtsw on bluesky
    www.reuters.com/investigates...  [images]
  • @noupside Renee DiResta on bluesky
    From a story ab one of Meta's AI chatbots setting up a meeting with a cognitively impaired elderly man.... guidelines for “romantic roleplay” with kids.  —  Don't let your kids talk to these things unsupervised — depraved engagement games.  Character.ai is also embroiled in a sui…
  • @marypcbuk Mary Branscombe on bluesky
    a bunch of folks I (used to) respect have gone to work on AI at Meta and company culture is what you walk past on the way to your desk [embedded post]
  • @sadknob Darren Ewing on bluesky
    “policies on chatbot behavior ... permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to ‘engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,’ generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are ‘dumber than white people.’”  —  www.reuter…
  • @barbarasobel Barbara Sobel on bluesky
    An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's AI creations to ‘engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual’ and generate false medical information  —  www.reuters.com/investigates...
  • @noahshachtman Noah Shachtman on bluesky
    What is the value to Meta of a Kylie Jenner-inspired “flirty” chatbot?  And how do you measure that cost against a human life? www.reuters.com/investigates...
  • @bachynski Kathleen Bachynski on bluesky
    “Bue wasn't the victim of a robber.  He had been lured to a rendezvous... She was a generative artificial intelligence chatbot named “Big sis Billie,” a variant of an earlier AI persona created by the giant social-media company Meta Platforms in collaboration with celebrity influ…
  • @samleecole Sam Cole on bluesky
    this story is so fucking sad, and every new detail that comes out about how Meta's chatbot characters product was made is more disturbing than the last www.reuters.com/investigates...  [image]
  • @damonberes.com Damon Beres on bluesky
    Oh good: After Reuters reached out, Meta removed portions of its content guidelines “which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children.”
  • @justinhendrix Justin Hendrix on bluesky
    New reporting from @jeffhorwitz.bsky.social, who got hold of internal standards for chatbot behavior at Meta.  [embedded post]
  • @bradheath Brad Heath on bluesky
    Meta permits its AI chatbots to “engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are “dumber than white people,” according to a policy document seen by @reuters.com.  —  www.reuters.com/inves…
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on bluesky
    “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.”  —  Meta removed that language from its internal guidelines after I raised it.  But yeah, boosting “engagement” with digital companions can look a lot like a chatbot hitting on a kid.  —  www.reut…
  • @justinhendrix Justin Hendrix on bluesky
    Here's the related story.  “Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children.”
  • @drewharwell.com Drew Harwell on bluesky
    Why does a $2 trillion company need a journalist to point this out [embedded post]
  • @ericgeller Eric Geller on x
    “'It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' according to Meta's ‘GenAI: Content Risk Standards.’” https://www.reuters.com/... [image]
  • @silvermanjacob Jacob Silverman on x
    A Meta AI chatbot convinced an old man that it was real and romantically interested in him. It invited him to visit her in NYC and gave him an address. On his way there he had an accident and died. https://www.reuters.com/...
  • @evanhill Evan Hill on x
    I'm sorry what [image]