/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple responds to the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit from March 2024, saying it sets “a dangerous precedent” and “threatens the very principles that set iPhone apart”

The US Department of Justice formally sued Apple in March 2024, accusing the company of having a “smartphone monopoly.”

9to5Mac Chance Miller

Discussion

  • @snugbucket @snugbucket on bluesky
    In other words, Apple won't be able to rip people off for non standard hardware and software any more...  [embedded post]
  • @vidushi_law Vidushi Dyall on x
    The DOJ alleges 🍎 follows a “monopoly playbook” in five key areas. 🍎 rebuts each point: 📱Super apps are fully allowed and already exist on iPhone. 🎮 Cloud gaming is supported via both web and App Store. 💬Third-party messaging apps are popular and unrestricted. [image]
  • @vidushi_law Vidushi Dyall on x
    UPDATE: Apple just filed its answer in the DOJ's sweeping antitrust lawsuit, calling the case an attack on innovation, user security, and consumer choice. The company argues the suit mischaracterizes its business model and misunderstands the tech market. [image]
  • @vidushi_law Vidushi Dyall on x
    According to 🍎, the case is a “misguided plea” to redesign the iPhone to serve rival business interests at the expense of user experience, privacy, and innovation. 🍎 argues this isn't an antitrust case, it's a demand to reengineer one of the world's most successful products. [ima…
  • @alpennec Axel Le Pennec on x
    @emcro @rjonesy It reminds me that Apple was accused of running ad campaigns that promoted apps from third‑party developers without their knowledge or consent in late 2021. More context: https://9to5mac.com/...