/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Elliptic estimates cross-chain criminal and high-risk activity at $21.8B+ in 2025, up from $7B in 2023, and attributes ~12% to crypto hacks from North Korea

Yohan Yun / Cointelegraph :

Cointelegraph Yohan Yun

Context & Ripple Effects

Elliptic’s estimate extends earlier coverage of North Korea’s role in crypto theft: the firm previously tracked $2.3B stolen from businesses between 2017 and 2022, while other analytics reporting described a sharp rise in theft from crypto services in the first half of 2025.

The significance is broader than theft totals alone. A move from $7B in cross-chain criminal and high-risk activity in 2023 to an estimated $21.8B-plus in 2025 suggests that tracing risk across chains—not simply within a single network—is becoming central to the sector’s compliance and security challenge.

First-order effects

  • Crypto exchanges, bridges and other services exposed to cross-chain flows face a larger apparent pool of transactions requiring risk screening and investigation.
  • North Korea-linked hacks account for roughly 12% of Elliptic’s estimate, reinforcing the immediate security and sanctions relevance of the record Bybit theft in H1 2025 for crypto-service operators.

Second-order effects

  • Blockchain analytics vendors and compliance teams gain a stronger case for monitoring fund movement across networks, rather than treating a transaction’s originating chain as the full risk boundary.
  • Higher perceived cross-chain exposure can push platforms and liquidity providers to tighten controls around bridges and rapid asset swaps, adding friction for some users and counterparties.

Third-order effects

  • If cross-chain illicit activity continues to outpace prior levels, crypto’s compliance burden will increasingly be organized around interconnected transaction paths instead of chain-by-chain oversight.
  • The pattern deepens the crypto legitimacy gap: the industry’s ability to support interoperable liquidity will be judged alongside its capacity to contain theft proceeds and other high-risk flows.

The trend: Cross-chain interoperability is expanding the operational perimeter for crypto security, compliance and attribution.