Sources on the key Microsoft-OpenAI clause: OpenAI decides when it has reached AGI, “sufficient AGI” means $100B+ in profits, and Microsoft may not build AGI
Questions like “what biases are in the training data” and “can I keep my data out of the LLM” are critical to corporations and people! [embedded post] @breadbunny : openAi believers making a contract that gives microsoft exclusive use until 2030 unless they manage to make AGI (they're not) or the new model will start making 100 billion dollars in profit (it's not) is so funny in such a sad way. — Like what a dumbass industry built and negotiated on hot air. Steven Levy / @stevenlevy : “The Clause [where OpenAI denies its models to Microsoft once they achieve AGI] embodies the raging divide between those who think that AGI is just a kiss away and those who think it's a pipe dream in the near- and even mid-term.” Read on, folks. www.wired.com/story/micros... X: Pinna Pierre / @pierrepinna : Fuzzy logic... What is AGI? Nobody agrees, and it's tearing Microsoft and OpenAI apart. https://arstechnica.com/... @arstechnica @benjedwards Several definitions make measuring “human-level” AI an exercise in moving goalposts. When is an #AI system intelligent enough to be [image] @themidasproj : OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit to ensure AGI benefits humanity, not shareholders. As they race toward powerful AI systems, any weakening of these protections could put the public interest at risk. The IRS must investigate to preserve OpenAI's duty to humanity. Forums: r/technology : What is AGI? Nobody agrees, and it's tearing Microsoft and OpenAI apart.