/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The UK High Court warns lawyers of possible criminal charges for using AI-generated fake legal material, citing two recent cases with hallucinated content

High Court to lawyers: cut the ChatGPT or else Robert Booth / The Guardian : High court tells UK lawyers to stop misuse of AI after fake case-law citations Šejla Ahmatović / Politico : UK judge sounds alarm on AI misuse in courts Tom Midlane / Daily Mail : Lawyers warned to stop using ChatGPT to argue lawsuits after AI programs ‘made up fictitious cases’ Bluesky: Lauri Donahue / @lauridonahue : I'm not sure it should be CRIMINAL for a lawyer to use AI, but it certainly should be grounds for sanctions, including possibly losing your license, to use it irresponsibly, without checking its work.  —  (This warning is bad news for legal AI companies, btw...) [embedded post] @mi-forest : Technically it isn't “hallucinated” content because AI is not capable of hallucinating.  AI is capable of massive errors and just making things up to fill the request JUST as the programming directed it to do. Forums: r/worldnews : UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court Slashdot : Could UK Lawyers Face Life in Prison for Citing Fake AI-Generated Cases?

New York Times Lizzie Dearden

Discussion

  • @lauridonahue Lauri Donahue on bluesky
    I'm not sure it should be CRIMINAL for a lawyer to use AI, but it certainly should be grounds for sanctions, including possibly losing your license, to use it irresponsibly, without checking its work.  —  (This warning is bad news for legal AI companies, btw...) [embedded post]
  • @mi-forest @mi-forest on bluesky
    Technically it isn't “hallucinated” content because AI is not capable of hallucinating.  AI is capable of massive errors and just making things up to fill the request JUST as the programming directed it to do.
  • r/worldnews r on reddit
    UK judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court