/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

DappRadar: NFT lending market volume has dropped 97% from a peak of ~$1B in January 2024 to ~$50M in May 2025, with borrower activity falling by 90%

Average NFT loan sizes have tanked, which DappRadar's Sara Gherghelas says means users are borrowing against low-value assets or being conservative with leverage.

Cointelegraph Stephen Katte

Context & Ripple Effects

NFT credit is weakening after a broader contraction in the underlying market: DappRadar previously recorded an 81% decline in NFT trading volume through July 2023, while Dune data showed an earlier 97% collapse from the January 2022 trading peak. The new data indicates that the retrenchment now extends to borrowing, not just spot trading.

That is a sharp reversal from the early lending-platform expansion, when Blur's Blend had quickly captured most NFT-lending market share after launch. Smaller loans and fewer borrowers suggest leverage is no longer supporting activity at the same scale.

First-order effects

  • NFT lending venues and their liquidity providers are operating with far less transaction flow as volume falls to roughly $50 million and borrower activity drops 90%.
  • Borrowers are taking smaller positions, consistent with DappRadar's indication that collateral is lower-value or users are limiting leverage.

Second-order effects

  • Platforms built around NFT-backed credit face pressure to retain lenders and borrowers when lower activity reduces the utility of deep lending liquidity.
  • Reduced borrowing can further constrain purchasing power for NFT traders, linking the credit slowdown to already-depressed marketplace activity.

Third-order effects

  • If low borrowing persists, NFT finance may shift from broad speculative leverage toward a smaller market serving only assets and users that can support conservative lending terms.
  • The episode reinforces that NFT-credit products remain highly dependent on underlying asset liquidity; a durable recovery would likely require renewed trading depth as well as borrower demand.

The trend: NFT lending is following the wider NFT market from high-turnover speculation toward lower-liquidity, more selective use of on-chain credit.